Tools & Wizards About Us
conservationgateway.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

conservationgateway.org

Conservation Gateway - Home

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

153 ms

conservationgateway.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Conservation Gateway content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about conservationgateway.org

The Conservation Gateway is for the conservation practitioner, scientist and decision-maker. Here we share the best and most up-to-date information we use to inform our work at The Nature Conservancy.

Visit conservationgateway.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Conservationgateway.org page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conservationgateway.org performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

conservationgateway.org

128 ms

default.aspx

761 ms

gtm.js

68 ms

init.js

178 ms

ScriptResource.axd

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Conservationgateway.org, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (761 ms) belongs to the original domain Conservationgateway.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 201.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

885.8 kB

After Optimization

684.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Conservationgateway.org main page is 885.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 401.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 54.2 kB

  • Original 71.3 kB
  • After minification 66.0 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 56.6 kB

  • Original 401.9 kB
  • After minification 345.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Conservation Gateway needs image optimization as it can save up to 56.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 75.3 kB

  • Original 341.4 kB
  • After minification 341.3 kB
  • After compression 266.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 71.1 kB
  • After minification 70.9 kB
  • After compression 56.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conservationgateway.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (31%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

60

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conservation Gateway. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

conservationgateway.org

conservationgateway.org

128 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

761 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

68 ms

init.js

init.js

178 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

138 ms

blank.js

blank.js

95 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

114 ms

corev15.css

corev15.css

207 ms

controls.css

controls.css

125 ms

tcg.css

tcg.css

202 ms

jquery-1.7.2.js

jquery-1.7.2.js

319 ms

jquery.ui.core.js

jquery.ui.core.js

233 ms

jquery.ui.widget.js

jquery.ui.widget.js

206 ms

jquery.ui.tabs.js

jquery.ui.tabs.js

233 ms

AdvancedSearch.js

AdvancedSearch.js

234 ms

jquery.ui.all.css

jquery.ui.all.css

236 ms

HomeRotator.css

HomeRotator.css

296 ms

Twitter.css

Twitter.css

294 ms

jquery-tmpl.js

jquery-tmpl.js

294 ms

touchtabs.js

touchtabs.js

295 ms

SharePoint.js

SharePoint.js

295 ms

HomeRotator.js

HomeRotator.js

347 ms

Twitter.js

Twitter.js

369 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

307 ms

spcommon.png

spcommon.png

117 ms

CGlogo7.png

CGlogo7.png

122 ms

tagline.jpg

tagline.jpg

149 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

161 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

169 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

193 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

179 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

197 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

201 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

235 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

221 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

232 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

239 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

244 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

275 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

276 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

291 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

291 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

288 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

317 ms

nav_icon.png

nav_icon.png

328 ms

TwitterIcon.png

TwitterIcon.png

327 ms

CRPERSPC.GIF

CRPERSPC.GIF

328 ms

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000141.png

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000141.png

341 ms

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000063.png

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000063.png

339 ms

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000185.png

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000185.png

411 ms

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000187.png

677059e3-753e-4870-afba-000000000187.png

409 ms

ea6239f5-aa2d-478c-aa3d-91df523eb624.png

ea6239f5-aa2d-478c-aa3d-91df523eb624.png

346 ms

nature_conservancy2.png

nature_conservancy2.png

344 ms

jquery.ui.base.css

jquery.ui.base.css

299 ms

jquery.ui.core.css

jquery.ui.core.css

57 ms

jquery.ui.tabs.css

jquery.ui.tabs.css

75 ms

mainBg.jpg

mainBg.jpg

143 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

106 ms

menu-bg.jpg

menu-bg.jpg

104 ms

downArrow.png

downArrow.png

99 ms

home_content_bg.jpg

home_content_bg.jpg

106 ms

Get

Get

220 ms

announcement.png

announcement.png

82 ms

announcement-video-bg.png

announcement-video-bg.png

96 ms

announcement-video-icon.jpg

announcement-video-icon.jpg

80 ms

banner_bg.png

banner_bg.png

80 ms

basic.png

basic.png

70 ms

business.png

business.png

84 ms

action.png

action.png

146 ms

measures.png

measures.png

130 ms

priorities.png

priorities.png

129 ms

tools.png

tools.png

127 ms

freshwater.png

freshwater.png

136 ms

marine.png

marine.png

170 ms

climatechange.png

climatechange.png

173 ms

fire.png

fire.png

180 ms

ecosystem.png

ecosystem.png

225 ms

peopleconservation.png

peopleconservation.png

225 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

490 ms

initstrings.js

initstrings.js

165 ms

stewardship762.gif

stewardship762.gif

385 ms

sliderTxtBg.png

sliderTxtBg.png

58 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

47 ms

Cover-Guidance762.gif

Cover-Guidance762.gif

433 ms

ED_tnc_67067576_VCR_VA_800.jpg

ED_tnc_67067576_VCR_VA_800.jpg

361 ms

journalarticles762.gif

journalarticles762.gif

396 ms

strings.js

strings.js

59 ms

core.js

core.js

77 ms

corev15.css

corev15.css

64 ms

Accessibility Review

conservationgateway.org accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

conservationgateway.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

conservationgateway.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conservationgateway.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conservationgateway.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

conservationgateway.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Conservation Gateway. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: