3.9 sec in total
202 ms
3.1 sec
624 ms
Click here to check amazing Conservation Register content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about conservationregister.com
Icon helps you find quality assured conservators, who can help you look after the precious things you care about. Find out more here.
Visit conservationregister.comWe analyzed Conservationregister.com page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
conservationregister.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
16/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value14,290 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value24.5 s
0/100
10%
202 ms
224 ms
669 ms
93 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Conservationregister.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Conservationregister.com.
Page size can be reduced by 45.3 kB (6%)
766.3 kB
721.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Conservationregister.com main page is 766.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 378.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conservation Register images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 214 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conservationregister.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (72%)
43
12
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conservation Register. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
conservationregister.com
202 ms
www.conservationregister.com
224 ms
www.conservationregister.com
669 ms
js
93 ms
style.min.css
138 ms
if-menu-site.css
198 ms
frontend.css
450 ms
buttons.min.css
286 ms
dashicons.min.css
361 ms
editor.min.css
285 ms
fonts.js
273 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
288 ms
jquery.min.js
755 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
392 ms
frontend.js
931 ms
utils.min.js
391 ms
editor.min.js
753 ms
quicktags.min.js
755 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
753 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
755 ms
dom-ready.min.js
753 ms
hooks.min.js
754 ms
i18n.min.js
756 ms
a11y.min.js
756 ms
wplink.min.js
818 ms
core.min.js
818 ms
menu.min.js
818 ms
autocomplete.min.js
817 ms
thickbox.js
817 ms
underscore.min.js
855 ms
shortcode.min.js
852 ms
media-upload.min.js
850 ms
tinymce.min.js
1107 ms
plugin.min.js
853 ms
js
75 ms
analytics.js
131 ms
collect
40 ms
logo.png
470 ms
regular.svg
891 ms
img1-1.jpg
472 ms
light.svg
1179 ms
img2.png
691 ms
img3.png
740 ms
IMG_4286-1-scaled-e1585659522859.jpeg
694 ms
brands.svg
835 ms
3AFD2B_0_unhinted_0.woff
508 ms
3AFD2B_4_unhinted_0.woff
650 ms
3AFD2B_2_unhinted_0.woff
1163 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
695 ms
conservationregister.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
conservationregister.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
conservationregister.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conservationregister.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conservationregister.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
conservationregister.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conservation Register. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: