Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

conservatory.org

Home | Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens | Pittsburgh PA

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

538 ms

conservatory.org screenshot

About Website

Visit conservatory.org now to see the best up-to-date Conservatory content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about conservatory.org

A botanical garden and glasshouse in the middle of Pittsburgh’s vibrant Oakland neighborhood, Phipps has provided a world-class experience to its visitors since 1893. Visit to discover breathtaking se...

Visit conservatory.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Conservatory.org page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conservatory.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

conservatory.org

61 ms

conservatory.org

47 ms

www.phipps.conservatory.org

307 ms

widget.js

166 ms

screen.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Conservatory.org, 60% (62 requests) were made to Phipps.conservatory.org and 6% (6 requests) were made to Match.adsrvr.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) relates to the external source Api.userway.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 197.3 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Conservatory.org main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.8 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 83.3 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conservatory images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 271.4 kB
  • After minification 271.1 kB
  • After compression 236.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB
  • After compression 86.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conservatory.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (27%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

60

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conservatory. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

conservatory.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conservatory.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Conservatory.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Conservatory. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: