1.3 sec in total
140 ms
868 ms
338 ms
Visit constantconcept.com now to see the best up-to-date Constant Concept content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about constantconcept.com
Constant Concept creates customized campaigns based on your marketing needs to maximize ROI. Every client’s needs are different and we work closely with you to ensure we are maximizing your ROI.
Visit constantconcept.comWe analyzed Constantconcept.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
constantconcept.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value15.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.046
99/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
140 ms
21 ms
39 ms
39 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Constantconcept.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (527 ms) belongs to the original domain Constantconcept.com.
Page size can be reduced by 58.9 kB (1%)
5.8 MB
5.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Constantconcept.com main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.2 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Constant Concept images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constantconcept.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (85%)
55
8
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Constant Concept. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
constantconcept.com
140 ms
css
21 ms
css
39 ms
css
39 ms
font-awesome.min.css
65 ms
bootstrap.min.css
156 ms
hover-dropdown-menu.css
59 ms
icons.css
137 ms
revolution-slider.css
67 ms
settings.css
61 ms
animate.min.css
206 ms
owl.carousel.css
178 ms
owl.theme.css
120 ms
owl.transitions.css
127 ms
prettyPhoto.css
178 ms
style.css
171 ms
responsive.css
198 ms
color.css
209 ms
email-decode.min.js
179 ms
sharethis.js
5 ms
jquery.min.js
225 ms
feedback2.js
43 ms
bootstrap.min.js
225 ms
hover-dropdown-menu.js
317 ms
jquery.hover-dropdown-menu-addon.js
242 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
286 ms
jquery.sticky.js
286 ms
bootstrapValidator.min.js
287 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
373 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
305 ms
revolution-custom.js
362 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
305 ms
jquery.appear.js
417 ms
effect.js
362 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
354 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
464 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
404 ms
jquery.countTo.js
421 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
415 ms
carousel.js
423 ms
scripts.js
458 ms
sharethis.js
14 ms
tweetie.min.js
527 ms
feedback2.js
32 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
476 ms
socialstream.jquery.js
483 ms
custom.js
475 ms
embed
215 ms
newcc.png
289 ms
afterBanner.jpg
302 ms
cc_933.jpg
365 ms
percentageDials.jpg
383 ms
home_page.jpg
370 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uK.ttf
9 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
312 ms
icomoon.woff
342 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
318 ms
js
34 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
7 ms
main.js
11 ms
tweet.php
72 ms
tweet.php
62 ms
js
40 ms
bg-11.jpg
84 ms
constantconcept.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
constantconcept.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
constantconcept.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constantconcept.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constantconcept.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
constantconcept.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Constant Concept. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: