Tools & Wizards About Us
construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

Construction Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Construction Tech Industry

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Construction Demolitionandrecyclingapac Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

Construction Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that provides the latest news, leading organization decision makers' viewpoints, technology trends, and audience insider information from the C...

Visit construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,410 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

130 ms

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

348 ms

style1.css

294 ms

bootstrap.min.css

368 ms

font-awesome.min.css

301 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com, 57% (53 requests) were made to Constructiontechreview.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Constructiontechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 329.7 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 719.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 65.3 kB

  • Original 86.4 kB
  • After minification 85.5 kB
  • After compression 21.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 250.4 kB
  • After minification 236.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Construction Demolitionandrecyclingapac Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

  • Original 719.1 kB
  • After minification 705.3 kB
  • After compression 662.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 194.0 kB

  • Original 304.7 kB
  • After minification 282.7 kB
  • After compression 110.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 194.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (71%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Construction Demolitionandrecyclingapac Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

130 ms

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

348 ms

style1.css

style1.css

294 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

368 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

301 ms

animate.css

animate.css

313 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

307 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

315 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

355 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

360 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

374 ms

style.css

style.css

436 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

375 ms

style.css

style.css

423 ms

social_sharing.css

social_sharing.css

421 ms

site.css

site.css

426 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

429 ms

css

css

96 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

223 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

150 ms

js

js

114 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

95 ms

element.js

element.js

98 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

717 ms

menu.css

menu.css

619 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

619 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

620 ms

skins4906.css

skins4906.css

621 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

717 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

109 ms

search.js

search.js

715 ms

jolly-menu.js

jolly-menu.js

666 ms

cio.js

cio.js

664 ms

css

css

59 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

76 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

103 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

165 ms

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

98 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

663 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

721 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

721 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

720 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

719 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

720 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

719 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

833 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

856 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

833 ms

main.js

main.js

856 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

855 ms

custom.js

custom.js

957 ms

css

css

13 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

770 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

145 ms

constr-logo-new.png

constr-logo-new.png

242 ms

x.png

x.png

517 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

241 ms

Twitter_cir22.png

Twitter_cir22.png

299 ms

close.png

close.png

519 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

518 ms

prev.png

prev.png

517 ms

next.png

next.png

821 ms

constr-logo-new.png

constr-logo-new.png

1126 ms

load.gif

load.gif

698 ms

370x420_7zPF.jpg

370x420_7zPF.jpg

698 ms

370x420_H2B6.jpg

370x420_H2B6.jpg

822 ms

370x420_Gh0E.jpg

370x420_Gh0E.jpg

821 ms

450x308_rmR4.778

450x308_rmR4.778

820 ms

450x308_360n.jpg

450x308_360n.jpg

821 ms

6gjnuAward-Logo.jpg

6gjnuAward-Logo.jpg

1126 ms

mhdw0Untitled-4ll.jpg

mhdw0Untitled-4ll.jpg

1125 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

476 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

256 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

151 ms

css

css

154 ms

ads

ads

263 ms

container.html

container.html

326 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

281 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

580 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

620 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

558 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

579 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

583 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

618 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

583 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

580 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

580 ms

ads

ads

118 ms

10928727491998700153

10928727491998700153

375 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

409 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

409 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

71 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

67 ms

Accessibility Review

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

construction-demolition-and-recycling-apac.constructiontechreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Construction Demolitionandrecyclingapac Tech Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: