Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com

Construction Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Construction Tech Industry

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

203 ms

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Construction Mobileapp Tech Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com

Construction Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that provides the latest news, leading organization decision makers' viewpoints, technology trends, and audience insider information from the C...

Visit construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com

133 ms

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com

354 ms

style1.css

262 ms

bootstrap.min.css

450 ms

font-awesome.min.css

339 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com, 63% (68 requests) were made to Constructiontechreview.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Constructiontechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 347.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 544.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 82.8 kB

  • Original 106.2 kB
  • After minification 103.1 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 544.1 kB
  • After minification 529.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Construction Mobileapp Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

  • Original 486.2 kB
  • After minification 472.5 kB
  • After compression 429.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 194.0 kB

  • Original 304.7 kB
  • After minification 282.7 kB
  • After compression 110.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 194.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (60%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Construction Mobileapp Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Construction-mobile-app.constructiontechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Construction Mobileapp Tech Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: