7.3 sec in total
159 ms
6.4 sec
659 ms
Click here to check amazing Construction Tech Startup Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com
Construction Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that provides the latest news, leading organization decision makers' viewpoints, technology trends, and audience insider information from the C...
Visit construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.comWe analyzed Construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 159 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value3,730 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
159 ms
966 ms
506 ms
597 ms
517 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com, 57% (72 requests) were made to Constructiontechreview.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Constructiontechreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 402.9 kB (29%)
1.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 610.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 130.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 40.1 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Construction Tech Startup Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 55.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 194.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 194.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (56%)
105
46
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Construction Tech Startup Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com
159 ms
construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com
966 ms
style1.css
506 ms
bootstrap.min.css
597 ms
font-awesome.min.css
517 ms
animate.css
542 ms
hover-min.css
565 ms
magnific-popup.css
579 ms
meanmenu.min.css
593 ms
owl.carousel.css
607 ms
lightbox.min.css
608 ms
style.css
622 ms
responsive.css
641 ms
style.css
666 ms
social_sharing.css
669 ms
site.css
671 ms
modernizr-2.8.3.min.js
670 ms
css
225 ms
adsbygoogle.js
242 ms
js
248 ms
gpt.js
251 ms
element.js
265 ms
bootstrap.css
1102 ms
menu.css
1081 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1082 ms
main4906_v1.css
1083 ms
skins4906.css
1082 ms
new_region.css
1084 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
search.js
971 ms
jolly-menu.js
971 ms
cio.js
972 ms
css
110 ms
font-awesome.min.css
119 ms
jquery.flipbox.css
340 ms
cube_slider.css
346 ms
bootstrap-glyphicons.css
114 ms
jquery.min.js
1053 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1050 ms
bootstrap.min.js
983 ms
jquery.meanmenu.js
1049 ms
wow.min.js
1051 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1053 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1237 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1236 ms
waypoints.min.js
1236 ms
lightbox.min.js
1235 ms
main.js
1235 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1234 ms
custom.js
2054 ms
css
47 ms
gpt.js
622 ms
atrk.js
653 ms
constr-logo-new.png
435 ms
x.png
2089 ms
linkedin_cirr.png
606 ms
Twitter_cir22.png
1773 ms
close.png
1773 ms
loading.gif
1767 ms
prev.png
1757 ms
next.png
1757 ms
constr-logo-new.png
1755 ms
toggleIcon.png
1963 ms
load.gif
1964 ms
370x420_EB23.webp
1961 ms
370x420_1k47.webp
1961 ms
370x420_QMvC.gif
1964 ms
450x308_1PCp.jpg
1959 ms
450x308_hiCV.jpg
2302 ms
1w8yvRanking.webp
2302 ms
show_ads_impl.js
503 ms
zrt_lookup.html
1219 ms
pubads_impl_2022101002.js
340 ms
ppub_config
339 ms
vtu9300400.webp
1765 ms
r9r7h30040054164.jpg
1999 ms
ec08nimage300x400123.jpg
1999 ms
300_400_msk9mapril.jpg
1763 ms
450x308_f5Wu.gif
2084 ms
450x308_HKfd.jpg
2068 ms
450x308_89o7.jpg
2604 ms
2kcsupro450.jpg
2601 ms
m2dwdpype450.jpg
2603 ms
hkpf7eprom450.jpg
2584 ms
analytics.js
1393 ms
t2phgbid450.jpg
2538 ms
l8vmzape238.jpg
2516 ms
css
777 ms
atrk.gif
1330 ms
integrator.js
807 ms
ads
366 ms
container.html
667 ms
cookie.js
613 ms
ads
136 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
556 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
557 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
939 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1095 ms
fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff
1386 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
943 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
944 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
945 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
947 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
886 ms
collect
240 ms
370x420_EB23.webp
945 ms
370x420_1k47.webp
943 ms
1w8yvRanking.webp
792 ms
vtu9300400.webp
792 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
290 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
686 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
754 ms
11058590455742083921
523 ms
abg_lite.js
545 ms
window_focus.js
552 ms
rx_lidar.js
118 ms
icon.png
487 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
111 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf
64 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf
143 ms
sodar
153 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg
68 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg
170 ms
sodar2.js
20 ms
runner.html
9 ms
aframe
124 ms
construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
construction-tech-startup.constructiontechreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Construction Tech Startup Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: