Tools & Wizards About Us
constructioncost.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

constructioncost.co

Construction Estimating | Cost Estimating | Construction Cost

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

266 ms

constructioncost.co screenshot

About Website

Welcome to constructioncost.co homepage info - get ready to check Construction Cost best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about constructioncost.co

Visit our site to get information of construction estimating software, construction estimating tool, construction estimating courses, construction estimating books etc.

Visit constructioncost.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Constructioncost.co page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

constructioncost.co performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,810 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

constructioncost.co

121 ms

font-awesome.css

58 ms

font-awesome.min.css

110 ms

bootstrap.css

117 ms

newstyle.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Constructioncost.co, 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) belongs to the original domain Constructioncost.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Constructioncost.co main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 39.0 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Construction Cost images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 37.1 kB

  • Original 461.0 kB
  • After minification 461.0 kB
  • After compression 423.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 56.1 kB
  • After minification 55.8 kB
  • After compression 49.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructioncost.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (44%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Construction Cost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

constructioncost.co

constructioncost.co

121 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

58 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

110 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

117 ms

newstyle.css

newstyle.css

107 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

107 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

115 ms

animate.css

animate.css

114 ms

bootsnav.css

bootsnav.css

165 ms

nav.css

nav.css

164 ms

set1.css

set1.css

162 ms

js

js

79 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

108 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

298 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

309 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

bootsnav.js

bootsnav.js

297 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

335 ms

main.js

main.js

335 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

338 ms

scroll-reveal.js

scroll-reveal.js

334 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

334 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

334 ms

embed

embed

180 ms

head_bc.png

head_bc.png

270 ms

logo.png

logo.png

269 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

308 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

269 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

411 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

269 ms

washington.svg

washington.svg

317 ms

illinois.svg

illinois.svg

312 ms

florida.svg

florida.svg

319 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

311 ms

owl1.jpg

owl1.jpg

414 ms

owl2.jpg

owl2.jpg

367 ms

owl3.jpg

owl3.jpg

368 ms

owl4.jpg

owl4.jpg

369 ms

owl6.jpg

owl6.jpg

368 ms

owl15.jpg

owl15.jpg

419 ms

owl7.jpg

owl7.jpg

470 ms

owl8.jpg

owl8.jpg

421 ms

owl9.jpg

owl9.jpg

421 ms

owl10.jpg

owl10.jpg

465 ms

owl11.jpg

owl11.jpg

469 ms

owl12.jpg

owl12.jpg

473 ms

owl13.jpg

owl13.jpg

608 ms

owl14.jpg

owl14.jpg

480 ms

global-logo.png

global-logo.png

556 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

472 ms

ny-border5.svg

ny-border5.svg

128 ms

embed

embed

336 ms

ny-border5.svg

ny-border5.svg

382 ms

Roboto-Regular.woff

Roboto-Regular.woff

391 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

348 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

349 ms

js

js

100 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

80 ms

ads

ads

404 ms

ads

ads

544 ms

search.js

search.js

27 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

29 ms

main.js

main.js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

constructioncost.co accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

constructioncost.co best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

constructioncost.co SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructioncost.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructioncost.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

constructioncost.co

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Construction Cost. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: