Tools & Wizards About Us
constructionjournal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

constructionjournal.com

CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL - Commercial Construction Leads and Project Information

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

766 ms

Page Rendered

367 ms

constructionjournal.com screenshot

About Website

Visit constructionjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about constructionjournal.com

Win more business with commercial construction leads. Powerful data, tools and analytics to help you stay ahead of your competitors.

Visit constructionjournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Constructionjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

constructionjournal.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

constructionjournal.com

189 ms

bootstrap.min.css

144 ms

one.style.css

142 ms

animate.min.css

164 ms

all.min.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Constructionjournal.com, 23% (10 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (209 ms) belongs to the original domain Constructionjournal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 488.1 kB (54%)

Content Size

901.8 kB

After Optimization

413.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Constructionjournal.com main page is 901.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 436.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 19.3 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 328.8 kB
  • After minification 291.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 59.1 kB

  • Original 117.5 kB
  • After minification 108.0 kB
  • After compression 58.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.1 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 377.5 kB

  • Original 436.1 kB
  • After minification 358.0 kB
  • After compression 58.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructionjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 377.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (70%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

constructionjournal.com

constructionjournal.com

189 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

144 ms

one.style.css

one.style.css

142 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

164 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

34 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

43 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

41 ms

consulting.style.css

consulting.style.css

140 ms

custom.css

custom.css

166 ms

custom-cj.css

custom-cj.css

117 ms

cc.css

cc.css

164 ms

21505615.js

21505615.js

69 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

40 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

209 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

23 ms

animsition.min.js

animsition.min.js

168 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

23 ms

jquery.steps.min.js

jquery.steps.min.js

22 ms

scotchPanels.min.js

scotchPanels.min.js

166 ms

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

28 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

24 ms

one.app.js

one.app.js

188 ms

custom.js

custom.js

188 ms

js

js

83 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

65 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

99 ms

banner.js

banner.js

63 ms

21505615.js

21505615.js

130 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

66 ms

app.css

app.css

96 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

162 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

87 ms

logo-full-white@2x.png

logo-full-white@2x.png

87 ms

logo-full-black-black@2x.png

logo-full-black-black@2x.png

86 ms

cj-mini-logo-black-black@2x.png

cj-mini-logo-black-black@2x.png

86 ms

logo-full-white@2x.png

logo-full-white@2x.png

66 ms

logo-full-black-black@2x.png

logo-full-black-black@2x.png

66 ms

cj-background-header-home-gray.jpg

cj-background-header-home-gray.jpg

144 ms

pattern-squares-white@2x.png

pattern-squares-white@2x.png

110 ms

icon-find-white@2x.png

icon-find-white@2x.png

108 ms

icon-data-white@2x.png

icon-data-white@2x.png

108 ms

icon-bid-white@2x.png

icon-bid-white@2x.png

108 ms

cj-backgroud-grid-red2.png

cj-backgroud-grid-red2.png

109 ms

Accessibility Review

constructionjournal.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

constructionjournal.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

constructionjournal.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructionjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructionjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

constructionjournal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: