Tools & Wizards About Us
constructionlitigationlawblog.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

constructionlitigationlawblog.com

Construction Archives - Stark & Stark, PC

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

527 ms

Page Rendered

469 ms

constructionlitigationlawblog.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Construction Litigationlawblog content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about constructionlitigationlawblog.com

Construction & Transition Litigation Law Blog Site

Visit constructionlitigationlawblog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Constructionlitigationlawblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 996 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

constructionlitigationlawblog.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

constructionlitigationlawblog.com

164 ms

119 ms

mmm1cll.js

67 ms

nav-bg.jpg

177 ms

nav-dot.png

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Constructionlitigationlawblog.com, 62% (8 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 23% (3 requests) were made to Cdn-jamfh.nitrocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (177 ms) relates to the external source Cdn-jamfh.nitrocdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 196.7 kB (81%)

Content Size

243.2 kB

After Optimization

46.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Constructionlitigationlawblog.com main page is 243.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 242.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 196.7 kB

  • Original 242.6 kB
  • After minification 242.6 kB
  • After compression 46.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 598 B
  • After minification 598 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Construction Litigationlawblog images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Construction Litigationlawblog. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

constructionlitigationlawblog.com

constructionlitigationlawblog.com

164 ms

119 ms

mmm1cll.js

mmm1cll.js

67 ms

nav-bg.jpg

nav-bg.jpg

177 ms

nav-dot.png

nav-dot.png

159 ms

78ce0913e643244b3221ed40bf2e7767.fontawesome-webfont.ttf

78ce0913e643244b3221ed40bf2e7767.fontawesome-webfont.ttf

25 ms

d

d

26 ms

d

d

35 ms

d

d

40 ms

d

d

31 ms

d

d

18 ms

d

d

24 ms

d

d

62 ms

Accessibility Review

constructionlitigationlawblog.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

constructionlitigationlawblog.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

constructionlitigationlawblog.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructionlitigationlawblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructionlitigationlawblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

constructionlitigationlawblog.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: