Tools & Wizards About Us
constructionmonitor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

constructionmonitor.com

Construction Leads | Construction Projects | Construction Monitor

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

145 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

254 ms

constructionmonitor.com screenshot

About Website

Visit constructionmonitor.com now to see the best up-to-date Construction Monitor content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about constructionmonitor.com

Construction Monitor is a lead generation tool that utilizes building permit data to help your business find construction projects and reach new prospects. Subscribe now and increase your business wit...

Visit constructionmonitor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Constructionmonitor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

constructionmonitor.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

constructionmonitor.com

145 ms

www.constructionmonitor.com

239 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

189 ms

respond.js

196 ms

jquery-min.js

224 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Constructionmonitor.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Js.hsforms.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) belongs to the original domain Constructionmonitor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 78.7 kB (15%)

Content Size

533.9 kB

After Optimization

455.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Constructionmonitor.com main page is 533.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 238.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 25.2 kB

  • Original 33.1 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 87 B

  • Original 238.7 kB
  • After minification 238.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Construction Monitor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 217.8 kB
  • After minification 217.8 kB
  • After compression 176.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 44.2 kB
  • After minification 44.2 kB
  • After compression 32.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructionmonitor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (65%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Construction Monitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

constructionmonitor.com

constructionmonitor.com

145 ms

www.constructionmonitor.com

www.constructionmonitor.com

239 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

189 ms

respond.js

respond.js

196 ms

jquery-min.js

jquery-min.js

224 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

201 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

308 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

197 ms

js

js

71 ms

v2.js

v2.js

60 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

177 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

104 ms

44543533.js

44543533.js

107 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

63 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

209 ms

cm-logo-white.svg

cm-logo-white.svg

176 ms

home-banner-bg-50.jpg

home-banner-bg-50.jpg

179 ms

real-time-permit-data.jpg

real-time-permit-data.jpg

210 ms

permits-tracked.jpg

permits-tracked.jpg

210 ms

construction-projects.jpg

construction-projects.jpg

215 ms

weekly-editions.svg

weekly-editions.svg

347 ms

power-search.svg

power-search.svg

359 ms

top-company-reports.svg

top-company-reports.svg

393 ms

developer-tools.svg

developer-tools.svg

415 ms

real-time-leads.svg

real-time-leads.svg

382 ms

detailed-statistics.svg

detailed-statistics.svg

390 ms

mailing-labels.svg

mailing-labels.svg

525 ms

permit-mapping.svg

permit-mapping.svg

532 ms

twitter-icon.svg

twitter-icon.svg

572 ms

facebook-icon.svg

facebook-icon.svg

566 ms

youtube-icon.svg

youtube-icon.svg

453 ms

blogger-icon.svg

blogger-icon.svg

598 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

631 ms

us-map-bg.png

us-map-bg.png

655 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

633 ms

us-map-dots.gif

us-map-dots.gif

959 ms

46 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

53 ms

banner.js

banner.js

66 ms

fb.js

fb.js

43 ms

44543533.js

44543533.js

84 ms

30 ms

beacon-v2.helpscout.net

beacon-v2.helpscout.net

15 ms

Accessibility Review

constructionmonitor.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

constructionmonitor.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

constructionmonitor.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructionmonitor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructionmonitor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

constructionmonitor.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Construction Monitor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: