3.1 sec in total
163 ms
2.1 sec
811 ms
Click here to check amazing Consumer Choice Center content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about consumerchoicecenter.org
Visit consumerchoicecenter.orgWe analyzed Consumerchoicecenter.org page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
consumerchoicecenter.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value61.1 s
0/100
25%
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,630 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value57.8 s
0/100
10%
163 ms
410 ms
46 ms
82 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Consumerchoicecenter.org, 20% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Consumerchoicecenter.org.
Page size can be reduced by 3.7 MB (16%)
23.2 MB
19.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Consumerchoicecenter.org main page is 23.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 22.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 194.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Consumer Choice Center needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 MB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Consumerchoicecenter.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (60%)
101
40
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Consumer Choice Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
consumerchoicecenter.org
163 ms
consumerchoicecenter.org
410 ms
script.js
46 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
82 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
33 ms
style.css
33 ms
image-map-pro.min.css
82 ms
public.css
44 ms
uaf.css
81 ms
trp-floater-language-switcher.css
104 ms
trp-language-switcher.css
84 ms
style.css
98 ms
css
105 ms
font-awesome.min.css
96 ms
progression_studios_custom_styles.css
104 ms
frontend.min.css
87 ms
swiper.min.css
105 ms
post-23167.css
109 ms
frontend.min.css
127 ms
all.min.css
112 ms
v4-shims.min.css
107 ms
post-702944.css
104 ms
frontend.min.css
117 ms
prettyphoto.min.css
123 ms
css
110 ms
jetpack.css
144 ms
jquery.min.js
156 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
171 ms
v4-shims.min.js
170 ms
js
103 ms
js
170 ms
post-19459.css
135 ms
animations.min.css
223 ms
image-map-pro.min.js
237 ms
stripe-handler-ng.js
343 ms
navigation.js
238 ms
scrolltofixed.js
238 ms
fitvids.js
343 ms
prettyphoto.js
344 ms
flexslider.js
344 ms
masonry.js
345 ms
script.js
347 ms
e-202436.js
77 ms
api.js
81 ms
video-backgrounds.js
344 ms
prettyPhoto.js
344 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
344 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
331 ms
log
622 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
296 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
297 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
294 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
295 ms
hooks.min.js
282 ms
i18n.min.js
278 ms
frontend.min.js
276 ms
waypoints.min.js
276 ms
core.min.js
278 ms
frontend.min.js
275 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
274 ms
search-magnify.png
191 ms
Logo_CCC_Full_White.png
140 ms
en_US.png
138 ms
pt_BR.png
139 ms
it_IT.png
137 ms
fr_FR.png
139 ms
es_ES.png
139 ms
de_DE.png
140 ms
Fit_For_Growth_Banner_Image.png
373 ms
Lifestyle_Choices_Banner_Image.png
460 ms
Tech_Innovation_Banner_Image.png
375 ms
AP_Associated_Press_Logo-1.png
174 ms
NY_Times.svg
174 ms
The_Guardian.svg
323 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbPpqP.ttf
169 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6zvPbPpqP.ttf
315 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbPpqP.ttf
322 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPPbPpqP.ttf
350 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PLbPpqP.ttf
351 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6IvTbPpqP.ttf
350 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbPpqP.ttf
351 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPTbPpqP.ttf
349 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6VfTbPpqP.ttf
350 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLADeqqIncY.ttf
352 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLAxeqqIncY.ttf
352 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLBdeqqIncY.ttf
352 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLCDeqqIncY.ttf
352 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLADe6qIncY.ttf
353 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLDdfaqIncY.ttf
353 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLDkfaqIncY.ttf
355 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLCDfaqIncY.ttf
355 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLCqfaqIncY.ttf
353 ms
Le_Monde.svg
316 ms
Politico.svg
215 ms
Le_Figaro.svg
262 ms
Financial-Times.png
258 ms
La-repubblica.png
260 ms
Miami-Herald.png
260 ms
National-Post.png
263 ms
USA-Today.png
311 ms
The-Independent.png
313 ms
Toronto-Sun.png
317 ms
US-News-World-Report.png
312 ms
Wall-Street-Journal.png
308 ms
Yahoo-finance.png
309 ms
4J6A3072-scaled.jpeg
312 ms
4J6A3111-scaled-e1649842638176.jpeg
311 ms
4J6A3114-scaled.jpeg
309 ms
fancycrave-520450-unsplash-1024x683.jpg
311 ms
Featured-Image-Blog-95.png
325 ms
Business-Traveller.png
320 ms
DC-Journal.png
322 ms
cityam.png
325 ms
WRS.png
319 ms
national-post.png
326 ms
cc-1.jpg
326 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4873z3bWvA.ttf
239 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B46r2z3bWvA.ttf
240 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B47b1z3bWvA.ttf
240 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B45L0z3bWvA.ttf
241 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4-Lwz3bWvA.ttf
242 ms
HTx3L3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B6xHT3w.ttf
242 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B47rxz3bWvA.ttf
243 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B497yz3bWvA.ttf
243 ms
HTxxL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B43Lj2FH2.ttf
243 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
320 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
348 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
499 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
349 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
353 ms
fancycrave-520450-unsplash.jpg
166 ms
sam-doucette-1183203-unsplash.jpg
156 ms
CCC-media-appearances.png
952 ms
no-to-prohibition-cover-1.png
199 ms
CCC_ag_Strategic_dialogue.png
205 ms
LPA_Cover.png
320 ms
consumerchoicecenter.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
consumerchoicecenter.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
consumerchoicecenter.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Consumerchoicecenter.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Consumerchoicecenter.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
consumerchoicecenter.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Consumer Choice Center. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: