5.9 sec in total
175 ms
5.3 sec
469 ms
Click here to check amazing Consumer Proposal S content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about consumerproposals.com
We help Canadians get out of debt and back to life. Learn about government debt forgiveness programs that can reduce debts by up to 80%.
Visit consumerproposals.comWe analyzed Consumerproposals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
consumerproposals.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value1,990 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
175 ms
4179 ms
131 ms
32 ms
323 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Consumerproposals.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Consumerproposals.com.
Page size can be reduced by 219.9 kB (29%)
756.6 kB
536.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Consumerproposals.com main page is 756.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 292.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Consumer Proposal S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Consumerproposals.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (77%)
53
12
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Consumer Proposal S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
consumerproposals.com
175 ms
consumerproposals.com
4179 ms
public-main.css
131 ms
css
32 ms
style.min.css
323 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
229 ms
swiper.min.css
151 ms
post-4059.css
190 ms
all.min.css
264 ms
v4-shims.min.css
192 ms
global.css
238 ms
post-4057.css
262 ms
formreset.min.css
292 ms
formsmain.min.css
303 ms
readyclass.min.css
317 ms
browsers.min.css
333 ms
modern.css
350 ms
css
21 ms
public-main.js
340 ms
jquery.min.js
400 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
376 ms
v4-shims.min.js
392 ms
jquery.json.min.js
438 ms
gravityforms.min.js
438 ms
utils.min.js
438 ms
js
65 ms
et-extra-customizer-global.min.css
440 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
552 ms
masonry.min.js
558 ms
scripts.min.js
686 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
558 ms
dom-ready.min.js
557 ms
hooks.min.js
558 ms
i18n.min.js
614 ms
a11y.min.js
613 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
623 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
623 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
614 ms
common.js
718 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
719 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
720 ms
waypoints.min.js
649 ms
core.min.js
539 ms
frontend.min.js
589 ms
fbevents.js
96 ms
consumerproposals-logo1.png
165 ms
BOXED-SLIDER-3-.jpg
291 ms
slider-1-1.jpg
364 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg.jpg
295 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg-2.jpg
299 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg-7.jpg
310 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg-4.jpg
364 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg-5.jpg
363 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg-6.jpg
366 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg-8.jpg
377 ms
ezgif.com-webp-to-jpg-3.jpg
382 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
69 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
70 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
97 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
106 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
106 ms
ET-Extra.woff
374 ms
consumerproposals.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
consumerproposals.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
consumerproposals.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Consumerproposals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Consumerproposals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
consumerproposals.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Consumer Proposal S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: