Access contact-center.cioreview.com. Best Contact Center Technology And Customer Services|CIOReview

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.295

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.4 s

1/100

10%

contact-center.cioreview.com

8 ms

contact-center.cioreview.com

1600 ms

gpt.js

205 ms

js

248 ms

atrk.js

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Contact-center.cioreview.com, 34% (41 requests) were made to Cioreview.com and 15% (18 requests) were made to Magazine.cioreview.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Contact-center.cioreview.com.

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Contact-center.cioreview.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 800.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 202.1 kB

Original 230.4 kB
After minification 128.0 kB
After compression 28.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 102.4 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 202.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 128.8 kB

Original 800.7 kB
After minification 671.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Contact Center CIOReview needs image optimization as it can save up to 128.8 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 421.9 kB

Original 797.4 kB
After minification 797.4 kB
After compression 375.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 421.9 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 154.5 kB

Original 187.6 kB
After minification 181.0 kB
After compression 33.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contact-center.cioreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Now

110

After Optimization

The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contact Center CIOReview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contact-center.cioreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contact-center.cioreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contact-center.cioreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Contact Center CIOReview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Best Contact Center Technology And Customer Services|CIOReview

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

contact-center.cioreview.com

contact-center.cioreview.com

gpt.js

js

atrk.js

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

contact-center.cioreview.com

contact-center.cioreview.com

gpt.js

js

atrk.js

jquery.min.js

javascript_version1.js

javascript_version2_ads.js

searchtracker.js

outer_cio.css

font-awesome.min.css

ionicons.min.css

master.css

qaforff_new.css

all_in_one.css

ddm8_v10_new.css

css

element.js

header_part_css_new.css

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

jquery.sidr.dark.css

search.js

functions.min.js

jquery.min.js

flexslider.css

css

bootstrap.min.css

jquery.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.js

right_part_new.css

css

bjqs-1.3.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

widgets.js

js&f=jquery.js,easing.min.js,1.8.2.min.js,carouFredSel.js,superfish.js,customM.js,flexslider-min.js,jtwt.min.js,jflickrfeed.min.js

ui_new.js

carouFredSel_new.js

superfish_new.js

customM_new.js

flexslider-min_new.js

jtwt.min_new.js