Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

contact-telephone.com

Contact telephone.com : Informations Gratuites de Contact

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

176 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

421 ms

contact-telephone.com screenshot

About Website

Visit contact-telephone.com now to see the best up-to-date Contact Telephone content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contact-telephone.com

Découvrez gratuitement les coordonnées des entreprises privés ou publics : Adresses postales, mails, Horaires d'ouverture, site web, numéro de téléphone...

Visit contact-telephone.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Contact-telephone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contact-telephone.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contact-telephone.com

176 ms

www.contact-telephone.com

213 ms

style-front.min.css

36 ms

style-main.min.css

57 ms

script.js

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Contact-telephone.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn.usefathom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (526 ms) relates to the external source Extranet.neoeditions.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.4 kB (21%)

Content Size

547.4 kB

After Optimization

435.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Contact-telephone.com main page is 547.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 381.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 63.7 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 80.1 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 381.2 kB
  • After minification 364.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contact Telephone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 85.2 kB
  • After compression 53.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (20%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contact Telephone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

contact-telephone.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

contact-telephone.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

contact-telephone.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contact-telephone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contact-telephone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Contact Telephone. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: