Tools & Wizards About Us
contact.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

contact.digital

Glasgow SEO Agency Services: Web Design, Market Intelligence

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

180 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

637 ms

contact.digital screenshot

About Website

Welcome to contact.digital homepage info - get ready to check Contact best content right away, or after learning these important things about contact.digital

We're a process driven digital marketing agency delivering SEO and website results for over 20 years. We research your market to ensure the best outcomes on your campaigns."

Visit contact.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Contact.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contact.digital performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contact.digital

180 ms

contact.digital

464 ms

5r54s.css

587 ms

5r4tr.css

400 ms

css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Contact.digital, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Contact.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 203.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contact.digital main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 826.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 187.0 kB

  • Original 218.3 kB
  • After minification 214.7 kB
  • After compression 31.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 826.0 kB
  • After minification 809.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contact images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 75 B

  • Original 265.5 kB
  • After minification 265.5 kB
  • After compression 265.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contact.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (31%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contact.digital

contact.digital

180 ms

contact.digital

contact.digital

464 ms

5r54s.css

5r54s.css

587 ms

5r4tr.css

5r4tr.css

400 ms

css

css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

41 ms

5r4tr.css

5r4tr.css

261 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

328 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

262 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

326 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

683 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

14 ms

autoptimize_4142d93a112baabe836099404ea23094.js

autoptimize_4142d93a112baabe836099404ea23094.js

883 ms

Graph_Paper_White_1.svg

Graph_Paper_White_1.svg

263 ms

Contact_Logo_Refresh_Colour.svg

Contact_Logo_Refresh_Colour.svg

281 ms

contact.digital

contact.digital

409 ms

WebDesign_Laptop.png

WebDesign_Laptop.png

495 ms

GoogleMaps_logo.svg

GoogleMaps_logo.svg

261 ms

fb-1.svg

fb-1.svg

501 ms

Chrome.svg

Chrome.svg

506 ms

Safari.svg

Safari.svg

509 ms

Gmail.svg

Gmail.svg

534 ms

google.svg

google.svg

661 ms

SEO_2_Orange_Small-GTMet.jpg

SEO_2_Orange_Small-GTMet.jpg

901 ms

SEO_4.svg

SEO_4.svg

765 ms

Design_4.svg

Design_4.svg

774 ms

Website_2.svg

Website_2.svg

844 ms

Clients_Handshake_Background_2.jpg

Clients_Handshake_Background_2.jpg

934 ms

Clients-Accenture.png

Clients-Accenture.png

909 ms

Clients-Aggreko.png

Clients-Aggreko.png

1021 ms

Clients-BBC.png

Clients-BBC.png

1026 ms

Clients-BP-1.png

Clients-BP-1.png

1100 ms

Clients-Cambridge-Uni.png

Clients-Cambridge-Uni.png

1236 ms

Clients-Wolseley.png

Clients-Wolseley.png

1167 ms

Resources_2_Orange_Small.jpg

Resources_2_Orange_Small.jpg

1334 ms

optimise-images-344x229.jpg

optimise-images-344x229.jpg

1363 ms

0-344x229.jpg

0-344x229.jpg

1351 ms

www-balloons-1-344x194.png

www-balloons-1-344x194.png

1502 ms

wireframing-344x229.png

wireframing-344x229.png

1644 ms

Website_1.svg

Website_1.svg

1573 ms

Iain_McRitchie_50_GTMet.jpg

Iain_McRitchie_50_GTMet.jpg

1588 ms

candice-nicol_50_GTMet.jpg

candice-nicol_50_GTMet.jpg

1604 ms

Robin-smith_50_GTMet.jpg

Robin-smith_50_GTMet.jpg

1620 ms

Contact_Logo_Refresh_White.svg

Contact_Logo_Refresh_White.svg

1752 ms

new-logo-wide.svg

new-logo-wide.svg

1825 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

44 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

45 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

123 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff

123 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff

144 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

144 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

143 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

145 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff

145 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

2021 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1872 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1916 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1725 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

1972 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

2052 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

2054 ms

FFD-Shape_1.png

FFD-Shape_1.png

2036 ms

Catherines_1_Purple.jpg

Catherines_1_Purple.jpg

1886 ms

Accessibility Review

contact.digital accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

contact.digital best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

contact.digital SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contact.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contact.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contact.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Contact. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: