Tools & Wizards About Us
containe.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

containe.in

CTPL | CTPL

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

503 ms

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

223 ms

containe.in screenshot

About Website

Visit containe.in now to see the best up-to-date Containe content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about containe.in

Visit containe.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Containe.in page load time and found that the first response time was 503 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

containe.in performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.292

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

containe.in

503 ms

containe.in

2366 ms

front.min.css

509 ms

style.min.css

712 ms

style.min.css

965 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Containe.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Containe.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 245.7 kB (25%)

Content Size

996.2 kB

After Optimization

750.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Containe.in main page is 996.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 488.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 223.1 kB

  • Original 245.1 kB
  • After minification 241.1 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.1 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 488.1 kB
  • After minification 466.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Containe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 492 B

  • Original 141.5 kB
  • After minification 141.5 kB
  • After compression 141.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 404 B

  • Original 121.6 kB
  • After minification 121.4 kB
  • After compression 121.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Containe.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (39%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Containe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

containe.in

containe.in

503 ms

containe.in

containe.in

2366 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

509 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

712 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

965 ms

css

css

30 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

720 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

1233 ms

divi-mega-menu-custom.css

divi-mega-menu-custom.css

732 ms

style.css

style.css

763 ms

ie-compat.min.js

ie-compat.min.js

948 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

952 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

731 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

772 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

1415 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

949 ms

common.js

common.js

967 ms

divi-mega-menu.min.js

divi-mega-menu.min.js

1112 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1190 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

1190 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

257 ms

ir-menu-icon-1.png

ir-menu-icon-1.png

246 ms

ir-menu-icon-2.png

ir-menu-icon-2.png

246 ms

ir-menu-icon-3.png

ir-menu-icon-3.png

564 ms

ir-menu-icon-4.png

ir-menu-icon-4.png

563 ms

product-menu-icon1.png

product-menu-icon1.png

564 ms

product-menu-icon2.png

product-menu-icon2.png

564 ms

product-menu-icon3.png

product-menu-icon3.png

564 ms

product-menu-icon4.png

product-menu-icon4.png

597 ms

e-sim-icon.png

e-sim-icon.png

614 ms

product-menu-icon6.png

product-menu-icon6.png

615 ms

vltd-menu-icon3.png

vltd-menu-icon3.png

731 ms

vltd-menu-icon2.png

vltd-menu-icon2.png

732 ms

vltd-menu-icon1.png

vltd-menu-icon1.png

768 ms

dealer-center-menu-icon.png

dealer-center-menu-icon.png

834 ms

our-story-menu-icon.png

our-story-menu-icon.png

851 ms

our-strengths-menu-icon.png

our-strengths-menu-icon.png

854 ms

market-presence-menu-icon.png

market-presence-menu-icon.png

975 ms

tick.svg

tick.svg

975 ms

shield.svg

shield.svg

3508 ms

footer-logo.svg

footer-logo.svg

1072 ms

font

font

16 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

1256 ms

1_-1920-x-962.jpg

1_-1920-x-962.jpg

1385 ms

2_-1920-x-962.jpg

2_-1920-x-962.jpg

1279 ms

3_1920x962.jpg

3_1920x962.jpg

1522 ms

Accessibility Review

containe.in accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

containe.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

containe.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Containe.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Containe.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

containe.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Containe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: