Tools & Wizards About Us
contentassistant.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

contentassistant.in

Content Assistant – Content Writing Services in India

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

973 ms

contentassistant.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to contentassistant.in homepage info - get ready to check Content Assistant best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about contentassistant.in

We are one of the best content writing services in India that provide all types of content solutions at affordable prices.

Visit contentassistant.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentassistant.in page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentassistant.in performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.179

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentassistant.in

105 ms

contentassistant.in

140 ms

0bb6ca6d80872470d760588332fbe45f.css

298 ms

js

111 ms

jquery.min.js

292 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Contentassistant.in, 15% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) belongs to the original domain Contentassistant.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 203.9 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

882.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentassistant.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 524.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 198.1 kB

  • Original 261.4 kB
  • After minification 261.1 kB
  • After compression 63.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 204.0 kB
  • After minification 198.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Assistant images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 524.1 kB
  • After minification 524.1 kB
  • After compression 524.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 96.4 kB
  • After minification 96.4 kB
  • After compression 96.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentassistant.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Assistant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentassistant.in

contentassistant.in

105 ms

contentassistant.in

contentassistant.in

140 ms

0bb6ca6d80872470d760588332fbe45f.css

0bb6ca6d80872470d760588332fbe45f.css

298 ms

js

js

111 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

292 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

100 ms

560e584f05df026594330cfd04a1c50c.js

560e584f05df026594330cfd04a1c50c.js

446 ms

Content-Assistant-Logo-3.png

Content-Assistant-Logo-3.png

109 ms

content-writing-services-in-india-website-home-page-image.jpg

content-writing-services-in-india-website-home-page-image.jpg

156 ms

women-working-on-laptop.jpg

women-working-on-laptop.jpg

244 ms

well-reseached-content.svg

well-reseached-content.svg

148 ms

delivered-on-time.svg

delivered-on-time.svg

153 ms

unique-content-writing.svg

unique-content-writing.svg

240 ms

content-reaches-target-audience.svg

content-reaches-target-audience.svg

243 ms

high-quality-content.svg

high-quality-content.svg

240 ms

result-oriented-content-writing-services.svg

result-oriented-content-writing-services.svg

244 ms

header-logo.png

header-logo.png

267 ms

krios-homes-logo-e1662212104662.jpg

krios-homes-logo-e1662212104662.jpg

263 ms

litmus-branding0-logo-e1683662856700.jpg

litmus-branding0-logo-e1683662856700.jpg

266 ms

5-e1662212803548.png

5-e1662212803548.png

270 ms

klaxon-homes-logo-client-logo-e1662211802363.jpg

klaxon-homes-logo-client-logo-e1662211802363.jpg

266 ms

geek-installation-logo.jpg

geek-installation-logo.jpg

277 ms

download.png

download.png

298 ms

Logo-Ravati-1-e1681642890252.jpg

Logo-Ravati-1-e1681642890252.jpg

292 ms

chitravansham-society-230x39.jpg

chitravansham-society-230x39.jpg

291 ms

hemensLogo.svg

hemensLogo.svg

293 ms

11-e1662212878846.jpg

11-e1662212878846.jpg

298 ms

client-logo9-e1662212769523.jpg

client-logo9-e1662212769523.jpg

302 ms

Google-my-business-how-to-improve-GMB-ranking-banner.png

Google-my-business-how-to-improve-GMB-ranking-banner.png

381 ms

content-writing-history-origins-relavance-article-banner.png

content-writing-history-origins-relavance-article-banner.png

381 ms

content-writing-trends-2023.jpg

content-writing-trends-2023.jpg

351 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

20 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

85 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

84 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

128 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

85 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

250 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

281 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

315 ms

Accessibility Review

contentassistant.in accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

contentassistant.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

contentassistant.in SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentassistant.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentassistant.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentassistant.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Assistant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: