Tools & Wizards About Us
contentcaretaker.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

contentcaretaker.co.uk

School Website Design - Home of the £500 School Website

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

25 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

565 ms

contentcaretaker.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Contentcaretaker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about contentcaretaker.co.uk

The best value £500 School Website design package, easy to use and update and mobile friendly. Why spend a fortune on a new school website?

Visit contentcaretaker.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentcaretaker.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentcaretaker.co.uk performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.359

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentcaretaker.co.uk

25 ms

contentcaretaker.co.uk

373 ms

style.min.css

18 ms

styles.css

26 ms

cookie.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Contentcaretaker.co.uk, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (658 ms) belongs to the original domain Contentcaretaker.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentcaretaker.co.uk main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 125.6 kB

  • Original 146.3 kB
  • After minification 146.1 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contentcaretaker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 297 B

  • Original 305.4 kB
  • After minification 305.4 kB
  • After compression 305.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 118.6 kB
  • After minification 118.6 kB
  • After compression 115.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentcaretaker.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (74%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contentcaretaker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentcaretaker.co.uk

contentcaretaker.co.uk

25 ms

contentcaretaker.co.uk

contentcaretaker.co.uk

373 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

18 ms

styles.css

styles.css

26 ms

cookie.css

cookie.css

27 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

31 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

Pe-icon-7-stroke.min.css

Pe-icon-7-stroke.min.css

33 ms

Pe-icon-7-filled.min.css

Pe-icon-7-filled.min.css

33 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

39 ms

cookie-plugins.css

cookie-plugins.css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

46 ms

css

css

38 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

52 ms

css

css

75 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

73 ms

cdb5803f46f25ebb44df6e9dea83cff3.js

cdb5803f46f25ebb44df6e9dea83cff3.js

51 ms

c6376422b52a7fb4f92bad6e1a1d5bda.js

c6376422b52a7fb4f92bad6e1a1d5bda.js

157 ms

6f02a4d652730b59e6f915e76593b3fe.js

6f02a4d652730b59e6f915e76593b3fe.js

172 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

153 ms

css

css

155 ms

css

css

169 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

170 ms

3e1322c35543c9de2571f50248ec718c.js

3e1322c35543c9de2571f50248ec718c.js

169 ms

21fde75efee02d160a1045f78824be46.js

21fde75efee02d160a1045f78824be46.js

186 ms

9d68293b780db47c29967c95f4d83f99.js

9d68293b780db47c29967c95f4d83f99.js

336 ms

9ad9ff1532f02efcc1c13e4726bf6caf.js

9ad9ff1532f02efcc1c13e4726bf6caf.js

186 ms

18397a6f559af997bcdbd44117822509.js

18397a6f559af997bcdbd44117822509.js

351 ms

f716070e71efaac0f4309f0bcb670c30.js

f716070e71efaac0f4309f0bcb670c30.js

350 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

204 ms

school-website-design-image.png

school-website-design-image.png

204 ms

school-website-design.jpg

school-website-design.jpg

205 ms

school-websitedesign-3.png

school-websitedesign-3.png

206 ms

font

font

193 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

658 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

560 ms

font

font

20 ms

font

font

210 ms

Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff

Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff

498 ms

content-caretaker-white-logo.png

content-caretaker-white-logo.png

192 ms

Accessibility Review

contentcaretaker.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

contentcaretaker.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

contentcaretaker.co.uk SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentcaretaker.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentcaretaker.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentcaretaker.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Contentcaretaker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: