Tools & Wizards About Us
contentdevelopmentpros.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

contentdevelopmentpros.net

Top Rated Digital Agency - Content Development Pros

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

471 ms

Page Rendered

804 ms

contentdevelopmentpros.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to contentdevelopmentpros.net homepage info - get ready to check Content Development Pros best content right away, or after learning these important things about contentdevelopmentpros.net

High-quality content writing, design, video, and web development services. Get the content you need today!

Visit contentdevelopmentpros.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentdevelopmentpros.net page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentdevelopmentpros.net performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentdevelopmentpros.net

29 ms

www.contentdevelopmentpros.net

25 ms

www.contentdevelopmentpros.net

55 ms

css2

57 ms

js

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Contentdevelopmentpros.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 160.9 kB (72%)

Content Size

223.8 kB

After Optimization

62.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentdevelopmentpros.net main page is 223.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 153.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 132.4 kB

  • Original 153.5 kB
  • After minification 121.7 kB
  • After compression 21.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 55.8 kB
  • After minification 55.5 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 14.4 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 833 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentdevelopmentpros.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 94% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (65%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Development Pros. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentdevelopmentpros.net

contentdevelopmentpros.net

29 ms

www.contentdevelopmentpros.net

www.contentdevelopmentpros.net

25 ms

www.contentdevelopmentpros.net

www.contentdevelopmentpros.net

55 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

js

js

130 ms

home-redesign.css

home-redesign.css

20 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

39 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

36 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

48 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

36 ms

typed.js@2.0.12

typed.js@2.0.12

40 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

111 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

111 ms

gclid.js

gclid.js

35 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

139 ms

hotjar-3673691.js

hotjar-3673691.js

222 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

123 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

103 ms

search-ic.webp

search-ic.webp

80 ms

bg.webp

bg.webp

80 ms

head-bg.webp

head-bg.webp

79 ms

check-ic.webp

check-ic.webp

80 ms

hero-lady-bg.webp

hero-lady-bg.webp

84 ms

ver-ic12.webp

ver-ic12.webp

84 ms

hero-stars.webp

hero-stars.webp

83 ms

client-2.webp

client-2.webp

83 ms

qoute-n.webp

qoute-n.webp

83 ms

client-3.webp

client-3.webp

83 ms

client-3-l.webp

client-3-l.webp

101 ms

stars.webp

stars.webp

102 ms

rfp-dw-arrow.webp

rfp-dw-arrow.webp

101 ms

rfp-arrow.webp

rfp-arrow.webp

102 ms

marketing-sec-arrow.webp

marketing-sec-arrow.webp

105 ms

rocket-icon.webp

rocket-icon.webp

100 ms

case.webp

case.webp

104 ms

case-logo5.webp

case-logo5.webp

104 ms

awrds-line-bg.webp

awrds-line-bg.webp

104 ms

idustries-bg-c.webp

idustries-bg-c.webp

104 ms

user-icon.webp

user-icon.webp

104 ms

telephone-icon.webp

telephone-icon.webp

114 ms

email-icon.webp

email-icon.webp

116 ms

f-arrow.webp

f-arrow.webp

118 ms

footer-lines-bg.webp

footer-lines-bg.webp

114 ms

link-ic.svg

link-ic.svg

116 ms

link-ic-o.svg

link-ic-o.svg

118 ms

link-ic-b.svg

link-ic-b.svg

115 ms

link-ic-m.svg

link-ic-m.svg

120 ms

link-ic-r.svg

link-ic-r.svg

119 ms

link-ic-p.svg

link-ic-p.svg

117 ms

link-ic-bad.svg

link-ic-bad.svg

147 ms

link-ic-lg.svg

link-ic-lg.svg

120 ms

link-ic-ow.svg

link-ic-ow.svg

144 ms

link-ic-kg.svg

link-ic-kg.svg

147 ms

font

font

101 ms

135 ms

zhZLub2njX-5ba26067.js

zhZLub2njX-5ba26067.js

165 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

100 ms

link-ic-dg.svg

link-ic-dg.svg

70 ms

phone-ic.svg

phone-ic.svg

72 ms

ser-card.webp

ser-card.webp

69 ms

29 ms

hero-lady.webp

hero-lady.webp

5 ms

ver-ic1.webp

ver-ic1.webp

12 ms

ver-ic2.webp

ver-ic2.webp

6 ms

ver-ic3.webp

ver-ic3.webp

11 ms

ver-ic4.webp

ver-ic4.webp

19 ms

ver-ic5.webp

ver-ic5.webp

9 ms

ver-ic6.webp

ver-ic6.webp

17 ms

ver-ic7.webp

ver-ic7.webp

14 ms

ver-ic8.webp

ver-ic8.webp

14 ms

pro-rate.webp

pro-rate.webp

15 ms

Accessibility Review

contentdevelopmentpros.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

contentdevelopmentpros.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

contentdevelopmentpros.net SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentdevelopmentpros.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentdevelopmentpros.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentdevelopmentpros.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Development Pros. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: