Tools & Wizards About Us
contentmotive.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

contentmotive.com

SEO Dealer Content Marketing - Blogs, Social Media, Reviews, Websites

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

95 ms

contentmotive.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to contentmotive.com homepage info - get ready to check Content Motive best content right away, or after learning these important things about contentmotive.com

Smart SEO Content for Automotive Dealers. Professional, quality content optimized for automotive businesses. Our services include: content building, blogs, social media, and dealer review.

Visit contentmotive.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentmotive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentmotive.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentmotive.com

1098 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

111 ms

bootstrap.css

87 ms

shortcodes.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Contentmotive.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Contentmotive.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.3 kB (14%)

Content Size

786.2 kB

After Optimization

673.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentmotive.com main page is 786.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 277.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 54.7 kB

  • Original 67.3 kB
  • After minification 65.6 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 277.3 kB
  • After minification 238.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Content Motive needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 239.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 197.4 kB
  • After minification 197.1 kB
  • After compression 183.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentmotive.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (73%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Motive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentmotive.com

contentmotive.com

1098 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

111 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

87 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

85 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

93 ms

styles.css

styles.css

157 ms

settings.css

settings.css

160 ms

zilla-likes.css

zilla-likes.css

163 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

164 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

202 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

228 ms

main.css

main.css

240 ms

animate.css

animate.css

230 ms

css

css

23 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

266 ms

style.css

style.css

291 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

793 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

300 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

319 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

314 ms

init.js

init.js

329 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

350 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

360 ms

zilla-likes.js

zilla-likes.js

379 ms

pace.min.js

pace.min.js

386 ms

css

css

52 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

153 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

235 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

235 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

243 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

262 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

267 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

299 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

310 ms

main.js

main.js

326 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

335 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

336 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

366 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

41 ms

Teal-3.jpg

Teal-3.jpg

92 ms

contentmotive-giant.png

contentmotive-giant.png

91 ms

CMLogo.png

CMLogo.png

89 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

90 ms

icon_phone_1.gif

icon_phone_1.gif

89 ms

icon_email_2.gif

icon_email_2.gif

89 ms

font

font

14 ms

font

font

66 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

sprite_social_6.png

sprite_social_6.png

119 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

113 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

113 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

144 ms

js

js

101 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

74 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

74 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

92 ms

font

font

48 ms

Accessibility Review

contentmotive.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

contentmotive.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

contentmotive.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentmotive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentmotive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentmotive.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Motive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: