Tools & Wizards About Us
contentop.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

contentop.com

Done-For-You Content For eCommerce Stores

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

681 ms

contentop.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to contentop.com homepage info - get ready to check Content Op best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about contentop.com

Affordable, tailored content for your online store. Let our AI create and our human subject matter experts proof read and customize that for you.

Visit contentop.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentop.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentop.com

80 ms

contentop.com

145 ms

css2

41 ms

css2

57 ms

css2

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Contentop.com, 40% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) relates to the external source Bigin.zoho.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 109.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

401.0 kB

After Optimization

291.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentop.com main page is 401.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 272.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 93.8 kB

  • Original 118.1 kB
  • After minification 111.9 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 272.5 kB
  • After minification 256.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Op images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (36%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Op. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentop.com

contentop.com

80 ms

contentop.com

contentop.com

145 ms

css2

css2

41 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

css2

css2

66 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

49 ms

css(1)

css(1)

66 ms

2174b117b066302d.css

2174b117b066302d.css

79 ms

026dd4f6c5a07333.css

026dd4f6c5a07333.css

74 ms

js

js

128 ms

WebformScriptServlet

WebformScriptServlet

962 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

82 ms

7ZaKJ8lrHCBHL05jZvNr.png

7ZaKJ8lrHCBHL05jZvNr.png

68 ms

photo-1693921289604-aa37858636e6

photo-1693921289604-aa37858636e6

80 ms

photo-1674027444485-cec3da58eef4

photo-1674027444485-cec3da58eef4

82 ms

photo-1573165265437-f5e267bb3db6

photo-1573165265437-f5e267bb3db6

98 ms

photo-1545987796-200677ee1011

photo-1545987796-200677ee1011

250 ms

data-engineering-machine-learning-ops.jpg

data-engineering-machine-learning-ops.jpg

252 ms

photo-1542596594-649edbc13630

photo-1542596594-649edbc13630

96 ms

spotlight-poi3.png

spotlight-poi3.png

104 ms

vt

vt

105 ms

vt(1)

vt(1)

247 ms

vt(2)

vt(2)

247 ms

vt(3)

vt(3)

248 ms

vt(4)

vt(4)

248 ms

vt(5)

vt(5)

249 ms

vt(6)

vt(6)

249 ms

vt(7)

vt(7)

250 ms

vt(8)

vt(8)

250 ms

vt(9)

vt(9)

252 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

252 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

113 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

113 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

112 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

115 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf

115 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

114 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

118 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

116 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

117 ms

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbk5k.ttf

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbk5k.ttf

116 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

116 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

47 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

118 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

64 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

129 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

77 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

128 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

76 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

129 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

75 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

128 ms

bigin-logo-xs.svg

bigin-logo-xs.svg

266 ms

Accessibility Review

contentop.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

contentop.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

contentop.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentop.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Op. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: