1.8 sec in total
433 ms
1.2 sec
249 ms
Click here to check amazing ContentQ content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about contentq.nl
Contentq builds fully automated job portals and news portals, based on open source technology. Start your own portal for next to nothing.
Visit contentq.nlWe analyzed Contentq.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 433 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
contentq.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
433 ms
291 ms
105 ms
108 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Contentq.nl, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (433 ms) belongs to the original domain Contentq.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 14.7 kB (4%)
361.7 kB
347.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Contentq.nl main page is 361.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 236.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ContentQ images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 93 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 103 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentq.nl has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (65%)
23
8
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ContentQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contentq.nl
433 ms
jFXWExs9sZD21NMj14rsBiwAAVg.js
291 ms
css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css
105 ms
css_NdVgz6YKifxQUEsW5xls_zI7Pn2F7E5U5Wb29zcu3vo.css
108 ms
css_PGbJgHCUCBf4dg7K9Kt8aAwsApndP4GZ9RuToPy3-Fk.css
114 ms
font-awesome.min.css
109 ms
bootstrap.min.css
127 ms
css_9vS7KTziVXM6cOtv0jZFlm30ZZXGCzz9d4oZYdJnbf4.css
205 ms
css_qfmBLkQRB54PoiuPLfEfH5OVOOYGSiyu768uh33tf-4.css
213 ms
css_6NHdjw9B0fhyquZEkR9c484tE9_jDHrlB14JFcSbS7o.css
219 ms
js_3FJuPbrylnPMOiswI_6eF6wvTss3Z9M6-YyGqwpKk1U.js
259 ms
jquery.meanmenu.min.js
227 ms
js_QY8nSvNGr8l2erNSTUrY9Hu99CEZ4Kvv2DfTKq1gYoI.js
383 ms
addthis_widget.js
409 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
220 ms
trappen.jpg
135 ms
contentq3.png
110 ms
facebook48.png
102 ms
twitter48.png
113 ms
rss48.png
101 ms
ubuntu.woff
130 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
164 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
analytics.js
33 ms
collect
30 ms
js_3FJuPbrylnPMOiswI_6eF6wvTss3Z9M6-YyGqwpKk1U.js
117 ms
contentq.nl accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
contentq.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
contentq.nl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentq.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentq.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentq.nl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ContentQ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: