7 sec in total
429 ms
6.5 sec
138 ms
Click here to check amazing Content Writerq content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about contentwriterq.com
Content Writing Services - Hire content writers for blog, eBooks, website, SEO & social media, company profile, LinkedIn Profile Makeover. Fully managed & affordable writing service.
Visit contentwriterq.comWe analyzed Contentwriterq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 429 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
contentwriterq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value16.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value2,180 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.038
100/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
429 ms
1045 ms
387 ms
575 ms
577 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Contentwriterq.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Contentwriterq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 210.5 kB (6%)
3.6 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Contentwriterq.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Writerq images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentwriterq.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (53%)
87
41
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Writerq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contentwriterq.com
429 ms
www.contentwriterq.com
1045 ms
bootstrap.min.css
387 ms
font-awesome.min.css
575 ms
portfolio.css
577 ms
slider.css
580 ms
style.min.css
605 ms
classic-themes.min.css
604 ms
styles.css
603 ms
fullpage.min.css
759 ms
filled-circle-within.css
760 ms
default.css
763 ms
css
25 ms
genericons.css
983 ms
style.css
786 ms
js_composer.min.css
1218 ms
wp-paginate.css
950 ms
jquery.min.js
1143 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
956 ms
owl.carousel.js
1144 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1150 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1180 ms
jquery.onepagescroll.min.js
1215 ms
main.js
1334 ms
js
89 ms
animate.min.css
1156 ms
index.js
1162 ms
index.js
1199 ms
scrolloverflow.min.js
1233 ms
fullpage.min.js
1241 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1345 ms
functions.js
1347 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1355 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1397 ms
wpcf7-recaptcha-controls.js
1430 ms
api.js
33 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1033 ms
css
14 ms
css
19 ms
www.contentwriterq.com
771 ms
default
364 ms
body-bg.png
646 ms
mob_btn_close.png
335 ms
logo.png
334 ms
mob_btn.png
335 ms
mouse.png
334 ms
section-1-arrow.png
334 ms
every-img.png
1475 ms
section-2-arrow.png
531 ms
changing-img.png
921 ms
section-2-arrow.png
525 ms
section-3-arrow.png
519 ms
section-3-arrow.png
711 ms
we-are-img.png
1115 ms
section-4-arrow.png
734 ms
section-4-arrow.png
836 ms
we-dont-img.png
1092 ms
section-5-arrow.png
938 ms
take-img.png
1415 ms
section-5-arrow.png
1120 ms
section-6-arrow.png
1143 ms
port-bg.png
1283 ms
port-main-bg.png
1312 ms
port-btm-left.png
1318 ms
port-btm-right.png
1345 ms
section-6-arrow-1.png
1475 ms
port-img-2.png
1511 ms
section-7-arrow.png
1517 ms
section-8-arrow.png
1547 ms
port-img-3.png
1800 ms
last-bg.jpg
1663 ms
port-img-4.png
1857 ms
port-btm-right.png
1708 ms
footer-img-1.png
1714 ms
ph-icon.png
1751 ms
map-icon.png
1855 ms
recaptcha__en.js
180 ms
loc-icon.png
1739 ms
js
151 ms
analytics.js
147 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
146 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
147 ms
segoe-regular.woff
1582 ms
leaguegothic-regular.woff
1624 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1664 ms
footer-img-2.png
1715 ms
collect
11 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
53 ms
twk-main.js
53 ms
twk-vendor.js
102 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
23 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
155 ms
twk-runtime.js
61 ms
twk-app.js
34 ms
contentwriterq.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
contentwriterq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
contentwriterq.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentwriterq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentwriterq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentwriterq.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Writerq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: