Tools & Wizards About Us
contentwritingsquare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

contentwritingsquare.com

Best Content Writing Services by Content Writing Square

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

607 ms

contentwritingsquare.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Content Writing Square content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about contentwritingsquare.com

Looking for the best content writing services? Feel free to contact Content Writing squareor visit our website for more details.

Visit contentwritingsquare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentwritingsquare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentwritingsquare.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.527

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentwritingsquare.com

130 ms

contentwritingsquare.com

503 ms

bootstrap.min.css

330 ms

animate.css

168 ms

fontawesome-all.css

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Contentwritingsquare.com, 13% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Contentwritingsquare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 203.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentwritingsquare.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 142.6 kB

  • Original 162.7 kB
  • After minification 121.2 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 41.5 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 557 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Writing Square images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 54.7 kB

  • Original 494.5 kB
  • After minification 494.3 kB
  • After compression 439.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 54.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 77.9 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 71.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentwritingsquare.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (68%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Writing Square. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentwritingsquare.com

contentwritingsquare.com

130 ms

contentwritingsquare.com

contentwritingsquare.com

503 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

330 ms

animate.css

animate.css

168 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

145 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

151 ms

lightgallery.css

lightgallery.css

170 ms

audioplayer.css

audioplayer.css

288 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

289 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

300 ms

slit-slider.css

slit-slider.css

335 ms

slick.css

slick.css

416 ms

base.css

base.css

434 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

427 ms

default-theme.css

default-theme.css

441 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

487 ms

contentwritingsquare.com

contentwritingsquare.com

696 ms

color-customizer.css

color-customizer.css

558 ms

js

js

55 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

305 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

15 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

14 ms

sidebar.css

sidebar.css

297 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

22 ms

sideone.js

sideone.js

312 ms

sidetwo.js

sidetwo.js

303 ms

jquery.3.3.1.min.js

jquery.3.3.1.min.js

423 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

509 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

458 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

509 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

509 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

628 ms

jquery.smartmenus.js

jquery.smartmenus.js

628 ms

lightgallery.js

lightgallery.js

627 ms

audioplayer.js

audioplayer.js

629 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

628 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

630 ms

jquery.ba-cond.min.js

jquery.ba-cond.min.js

759 ms

jquery.slitslider.js

jquery.slitslider.js

758 ms

slick.js

slick.js

759 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

760 ms

counter.js

counter.js

759 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

793 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

854 ms

js

js

60 ms

contact-form.js

contact-form.js

851 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

853 ms

map.js

map.js

862 ms

typer.js

typer.js

867 ms

color-customizer.js

color-customizer.js

852 ms

theme-script.js

theme-script.js

927 ms

css

css

35 ms

css

css

53 ms

css

css

58 ms

css

css

57 ms

default

default

103 ms

cp-logo-web.png

cp-logo-web.png

602 ms

phone.png

phone.png

602 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

603 ms

user3.png

user3.png

707 ms

02.png

02.png

708 ms

user1.png

user1.png

708 ms

user2.png

user2.png

709 ms

01.png

01.png

731 ms

l1.png

l1.png

728 ms

l2.png

l2.png

748 ms

l3.png

l3.png

791 ms

l4.png

l4.png

851 ms

l5.png

l5.png

830 ms

l6.png

l6.png

793 ms

web-banner4.jpg

web-banner4.jpg

798 ms

05.jpg

05.jpg

810 ms

font

font

63 ms

font

font

249 ms

font

font

249 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1182 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

914 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

875 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

858 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

911 ms

themify9f249f24.woff

themify9f249f24.woff

948 ms

06.jpg

06.jpg

983 ms

07.jpg

07.jpg

895 ms

cp-logo-web.html

cp-logo-web.html

921 ms

cross.png

cross.png

916 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

949 ms

17.jpg

17.jpg

998 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

998 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

143 ms

map.png

map.png

690 ms

ajax-loader.html

ajax-loader.html

941 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

56 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

95 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

117 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

90 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

89 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

94 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

64 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

80 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

102 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

116 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

102 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

116 ms

Accessibility Review

contentwritingsquare.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

contentwritingsquare.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

contentwritingsquare.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentwritingsquare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentwritingsquare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentwritingsquare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Writing Square. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: