3 sec in total
398 ms
2.4 sec
214 ms
Visit contur-travel.ro now to see the best up-to-date Contur Travel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contur-travel.ro
Visit contur-travel.roWe analyzed Contur-travel.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 398 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
contur-travel.ro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value8.1 s
42/100
10%
398 ms
549 ms
128 ms
253 ms
376 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Contur-travel.ro, 5% (2 requests) were made to Cookiehub.net and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Contur-travel.ro.
Page size can be reduced by 58.3 kB (6%)
1.0 MB
944.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Contur-travel.ro main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 542.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contur Travel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 301 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contur-travel.ro has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (84%)
38
6
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contur Travel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contur-travel.ro
398 ms
contur-travel.ro
549 ms
style.min.css
128 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
253 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
376 ms
styles.css
376 ms
odometer.min.css
381 ms
owl.carousel.css
379 ms
travel-agency-companion-public.min.css
381 ms
animate.css
385 ms
css
48 ms
style.css
626 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
506 ms
index.css
506 ms
jetpack.css
637 ms
jquery.min.js
649 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
512 ms
lodash.min.js
635 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
646 ms
wte-public.js
769 ms
index.js
749 ms
index.js
755 ms
owl.carousel.js
759 ms
odometer.min.js
759 ms
waypoint.min.js
761 ms
travel-agency-companion-public.min.js
872 ms
all.min.js
1375 ms
v4-shims.min.js
885 ms
owl.carousel.aria.min.js
884 ms
wow.min.js
887 ms
modal-accessibility.min.js
894 ms
custom.min.js
995 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1009 ms
e-202421.js
22 ms
ct-76.jpg
344 ms
banner-img.jpg
802 ms
logo-anpc1-1-e1665480831277.png
479 ms
logo-litigii-1.png
451 ms
e4cd0971.js
376 ms
2.4.13.css
5 ms
contur-travel.ro accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
contur-travel.ro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
contur-travel.ro SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RO
RO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contur-travel.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contur-travel.ro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contur-travel.ro
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Contur Travel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: