7.3 sec in total
194 ms
6.2 sec
962 ms
Visit conversations.be now to see the best up-to-date Conversations content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about conversations.be
At Conversations Digital, We transform underperforming attorney websites into client-generating machines.
Visit conversations.beWe analyzed Conversations.be page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
conversations.be performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value34.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value3,420 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value22.8 s
1/100
10%
194 ms
182 ms
3751 ms
101 ms
120 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Conversations.be, 62% (49 requests) were made to Neworleanssocialmediaconsulting.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Neworleanssocialmediaconsulting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 684.6 kB (50%)
1.4 MB
689.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Conversations.be main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 509.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conversations images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 308.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 281.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conversations.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 281.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (68%)
68
22
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conversations. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
conversations.be
194 ms
neworleanssocialmediaconsulting.com
182 ms
www.neworleanssocialmediaconsulting.com
3751 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
101 ms
eb-tec-style.css
120 ms
flick.css
141 ms
www.neworleanssocialmediaconsulting.com
861 ms
social_widget.css
150 ms
checkbox.min.css
159 ms
css
24 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
166 ms
form.min.css
183 ms
style.css
211 ms
motioncss.css
232 ms
motioncss-responsive.css
235 ms
font-awesome.css
236 ms
magnific-popup.css
243 ms
fotorama.css
283 ms
style.css
319 ms
responsive.css
313 ms
us_corsa_custom_styles.css
298 ms
jetpack.css
309 ms
jquery.js
357 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
358 ms
scrollTo.js
374 ms
jquery.form.min.js
392 ms
mailchimp.js
393 ms
core.min.js
427 ms
datepicker.js
424 ms
supersized.3.2.7.js
438 ms
script.js
469 ms
widget.js
65 ms
classie.js
1545 ms
photon.js
458 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
469 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
471 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
523 ms
supersized.shutter.js
517 ms
waypoints.min.js
538 ms
imagesloaded.js
549 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
plugins.js
590 ms
us.widgets.js
541 ms
comment-reply.min.js
529 ms
wp-embed.min.js
516 ms
jquery.parallax.js
544 ms
fotorama.js
585 ms
MEGAN_TALK_ROUND_M.png
312 ms
STACY-HILTON.jpg
60 ms
LEX-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
184 ms
DLRBA-LOGO.jpg
331 ms
CHASE-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
341 ms
GB-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
210 ms
KELLY-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
1199 ms
THIB-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
265 ms
COAST-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
1198 ms
threebestrated-logo.png
293 ms
INDEPTH-LOGO.jpg
297 ms
LOGO-AT-LILLY.jpg
298 ms
TOUL-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
252 ms
CANNERY-PORTFOLIO-IMG-WHT.jpg
280 ms
LOGO_MEDIA_ORANGE_S.png
109 ms
PARALLAX_BG_GRAY.jpg
149 ms
HMPG-WHAT-WE-DO.jpg
201 ms
PROJECTS.jpg
298 ms
BLURRED-BG.jpg
92 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
53 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
56 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
54 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
173 ms
2HG_tEPiQ4Z6795cGfdivKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
54 ms
LqowQDslGv4DmUBAfWa2Vw.ttf
54 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
53 ms
count.js
239 ms
hovercard.css
38 ms
services.css
57 ms
g.gif
16 ms
conversations.be accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
conversations.be best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
conversations.be SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conversations.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conversations.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
conversations.be
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conversations. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: