Access copycatink.com. CopyCat Ink | High Quality Business Printing in Northampton, MA

Report Summary

About Website

Welcome to copycatink.com homepage info - get ready to check Copy Cat Ink best content right away, or after learning these important things about copycatink.com

We are open for curbside pick up or free local delivery for our business customers. We look forward to helping you!

Visit copycatink.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,820 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

copycatink.com

1284 ms

style.min.css

16 ms

css

45 ms

astra-addon-6723e0f8c642e0-42767303.css

29 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Copycatink.com, 28% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Copycatink.com.

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Copycatink.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 146.6 kB

Original 172.7 kB
After minification 168.7 kB
After compression 26.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 626.9 kB

Original 2.7 MB
After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Copy Cat Ink needs image optimization as it can save up to 626.9 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 179 B

Original 357.9 kB
After minification 357.9 kB
After compression 357.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 640 B

Original 75.1 kB
After minification 75.1 kB
After compression 74.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Copycatink.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Copy Cat Ink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Copycatink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Copycatink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

copycatink.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Copy Cat Ink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

CopyCat Ink | High Quality Business Printing in Northampton, MA

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)