Tools & Wizards About Us
coquest.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

coquest.com

Coquest | Global institutional futures, options brokerage, hedging

Page Load Speed

980 ms in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

523 ms

Page Rendered

354 ms

coquest.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Coquest content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coquest.com

Brokerage firm executing Commodity Futures Trades for multi-national corporations, institutional banks, oil companies, utilities and energy marketers.

Visit coquest.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Coquest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 877 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coquest.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.coquest.com

103 ms

bootstrap.min.css

57 ms

all.css

160 ms

css

49 ms

ekko-lightbox.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Coquest.com, 31% (8 requests) were made to Assets.coquest.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (160 ms) relates to the external source Use.fontawesome.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

512.9 kB

After Optimization

461.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Coquest.com main page is 512.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 418.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 418.9 kB
  • After minification 401.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coquest images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 73 B

  • Original 39.0 kB
  • After minification 39.0 kB
  • After compression 38.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 860 B

  • Original 13.0 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coquest.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (50%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coquest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.coquest.com

www.coquest.com

103 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

57 ms

all.css

all.css

160 ms

css

css

49 ms

ekko-lightbox.css

ekko-lightbox.css

54 ms

coquest.css

coquest.css

138 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

36 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

53 ms

ekko-lightbox.js

ekko-lightbox.js

45 ms

anchor.min.js

anchor.min.js

43 ms

css

css

12 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

34 ms

datadog-logs-v4.js

datadog-logs-v4.js

28 ms

13c0bebecafb0491ee5a6fc9102e1674.jpg

13c0bebecafb0491ee5a6fc9102e1674.jpg

95 ms

memopad-source-Iuwabtr7_1600.jpg

memopad-source-Iuwabtr7_1600.jpg

148 ms

memopad-source-HQ5FP8LY_1600.png

memopad-source-HQ5FP8LY_1600.png

96 ms

memopad-source-b4XSHKdJ_1600.png

memopad-source-b4XSHKdJ_1600.png

105 ms

memopad-source-kZWFC0EL_1600.png

memopad-source-kZWFC0EL_1600.png

121 ms

8440c6957f8d7a9301bd9fdee94bf11f.png

8440c6957f8d7a9301bd9fdee94bf11f.png

76 ms

memopad-source-SZq3shwW.png

memopad-source-SZq3shwW.png

82 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

font

font

22 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

13 ms

font

font

29 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

83 ms

js

js

73 ms

Accessibility Review

coquest.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Best Practices

coquest.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

coquest.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coquest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coquest.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coquest.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Coquest. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: