Tools & Wizards About Us
coreconstructionsolution.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

coreconstructionsolution.com

Core Construction Solutions - Groundworks and Civil Engineering

Page Load Speed

10.8 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

coreconstructionsolution.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Core Construction Solution content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coreconstructionsolution.com

Groundworks and civil engineering company based in Witham, Essex – covering Essex and the surrounding counties in addition to north and east London.

Visit coreconstructionsolution.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Coreconstructionsolution.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coreconstructionsolution.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,080 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

coreconstructionsolution.com

1408 ms

css

33 ms

api.js

62 ms

autoptimize_b64dea62906f0754ef0fabc0d5eb94db.js

364 ms

embed

171 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Coreconstructionsolution.com, 37% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Coreconstructionsolution.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (14%)

Content Size

8.2 MB

After Optimization

7.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Coreconstructionsolution.com main page is 8.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 89.6 kB
  • After minification 89.3 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 532 B

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 6.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Core Construction Solution images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 412.5 kB
  • After minification 412.5 kB
  • After compression 410.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 161.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coreconstructionsolution.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (27%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Core Construction Solution. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

coreconstructionsolution.com

coreconstructionsolution.com

1408 ms

css

css

33 ms

api.js

api.js

62 ms

autoptimize_b64dea62906f0754ef0fabc0d5eb94db.js

autoptimize_b64dea62906f0754ef0fabc0d5eb94db.js

364 ms

embed

embed

171 ms

core-web-logo-strap.png

core-web-logo-strap.png

230 ms

hands.jpg

hands.jpg

396 ms

dummy-transparent-py6xb1nfi616ktgrx8edygs5kvgmtejwxe7rlxwuu8.png

dummy-transparent-py6xb1nfi616ktgrx8edygs5kvgmtejwxe7rlxwuu8.png

233 ms

new-project-8.jpg

new-project-8.jpg

634 ms

new-project-7.jpg

new-project-7.jpg

790 ms

new-project-6.jpg

new-project-6.jpg

698 ms

logo_white-131x55.png

logo_white-131x55.png

388 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

28 ms

fallback

fallback

42 ms

js

js

60 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

8 ms

css

css

14 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

5 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

19 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

23 ms

css

css

29 ms

what-we-offer-2.jpg

what-we-offer-2.jpg

320 ms

what-we-offer_.jpg

what-we-offer_.jpg

1529 ms

refill

refill

740 ms

new-project-8-qbq1gyxqv6rwoc742yombjo71xfmj32fcg3hqunggw.jpg

new-project-8-qbq1gyxqv6rwoc742yombjo71xfmj32fcg3hqunggw.jpg

625 ms

new-project-7-qbq1ae2f0xrnelr6i4amv7g1ctv4ncy2fvp4t4eo0w.jpg

new-project-7-qbq1ae2f0xrnelr6i4amv7g1ctv4ncy2fvp4t4eo0w.jpg

373 ms

new-project-6-qbq14tusl85kpntzz7r3m3yutr9y3tv8ocqpl6niu8.jpg

new-project-6-qbq14tusl85kpntzz7r3m3yutr9y3tv8ocqpl6niu8.jpg

363 ms

about-us.png

about-us.png

2487 ms

plant.png

plant.png

610 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

7 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

41 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

41 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf

67 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf

68 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

67 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

67 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

65 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf

68 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

69 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf

69 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf

98 ms

autoptimize_7af91bbfc354de87170d9de5a2991d97.css

autoptimize_7af91bbfc354de87170d9de5a2991d97.css

321 ms

autoptimize_7af91bbfc354de87170d9de5a2991d97.css

autoptimize_7af91bbfc354de87170d9de5a2991d97.css

117 ms

minigrid.js

minigrid.js

82 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

79 ms

4x_fpcng.jpg

4x_fpcng.jpg

457 ms

autoptimize_7af91bbfc354de87170d9de5a2991d97.css

autoptimize_7af91bbfc354de87170d9de5a2991d97.css

313 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

79 ms

Accessibility Review

coreconstructionsolution.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

coreconstructionsolution.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

coreconstructionsolution.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coreconstructionsolution.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coreconstructionsolution.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coreconstructionsolution.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Core Construction Solution. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: