Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

corecontent.com

Core Content Review of Family Medicine - Your source for staying medically current

Page Load Speed

595 ms in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

401 ms

Page Rendered

146 ms

corecontent.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Core Content content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about corecontent.com

Whether you are looking for ABFM Longitudinal Assessment Self-Study or Board Exam preparation, Core Content Review of Family Medicine is a name you can trust. Core offers two home study options - prin...

Visit corecontent.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Corecontent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 547 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

corecontent.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

corecontent.com

48 ms

qt=q:95

122 ms

script.js

47 ms

UX.4.34.2.js

48 ms

script.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Corecontent.com, 83% (10 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (297 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

411.5 kB

After Optimization

225.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Corecontent.com main page is 411.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 250.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 74.4 kB

  • Original 90.5 kB
  • After minification 90.5 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 71.0 kB
  • After minification 71.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Core Content images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 111.5 kB

  • Original 250.0 kB
  • After minification 250.0 kB
  • After compression 138.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.5 kB or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (57%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Core Content. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

corecontent.com accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

corecontent.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

corecontent.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corecontent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corecontent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Core Content. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: