Tools & Wizards About Us
corecuttermachine.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

corecuttermachine.com

Core Cutter Machine | Paper Core Cutting Machine | Core Cutting Machine

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

325 ms

corecuttermachine.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to corecuttermachine.com homepage info - get ready to check Core Cutter Machine best content right away, or after learning these important things about corecuttermachine.com

Core Cutting Machine Manufacturer, also paper core cutting, manual paper core cutter, Core Cutting Machine, core cutter machine with accuracy.

Visit corecuttermachine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Corecuttermachine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

corecuttermachine.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value18.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value43.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.103

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.corecuttermachine.com

2297 ms

js

96 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

112 ms

style.min.css

226 ms

crellyslider.min.css

240 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Corecuttermachine.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Corecuttingmachine.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Corecuttingmachine.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

654.6 kB

After Optimization

604.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Corecuttermachine.com main page is 654.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 498.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 44.3 kB
  • After minification 43.2 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 498.3 kB
  • After minification 486.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Core Cutter Machine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 402 B

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 84.0 kB
  • After compression 83.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 28.0 kB
  • After minification 28.0 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corecuttermachine.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (44%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Core Cutter Machine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.corecuttermachine.com

www.corecuttermachine.com

2297 ms

js

js

96 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

112 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

226 ms

crellyslider.min.css

crellyslider.min.css

240 ms

style.css

style.css

157 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

257 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

259 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

258 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

374 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

316 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

332 ms

jquery.crellyslider.min.js

jquery.crellyslider.min.js

373 ms

jquery.slicknav.js

jquery.slicknav.js

406 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

406 ms

prettyPhoto-init.js

prettyPhoto-init.js

405 ms

global.js

global.js

438 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

484 ms

js

js

77 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

97 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

award.jpg

award.jpg

1826 ms

jas_anz.jpg

jas_anz.jpg

1835 ms

fullyautomatic-1.jpg

fullyautomatic-1.jpg

4056 ms

corecuttermachine3.jpg

corecuttermachine3.jpg

4026 ms

semi-1.jpg

semi-1.jpg

4037 ms

paper1.jpg

paper1.jpg

3970 ms

main-bg.png

main-bg.png

221 ms

KEW-ENGG.-MFG.-PVT.LTD-LOGO-2.png

KEW-ENGG.-MFG.-PVT.LTD-LOGO-2.png

209 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

134 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

133 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

154 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

187 ms

core-cutter-machine-500x500-1.jpg

core-cutter-machine-500x500-1.jpg

315 ms

corecuttermachine3-1.jpg

corecuttermachine3-1.jpg

313 ms

Automatic-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-1.jpg

Automatic-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-1.jpg

298 ms

1431198.jpg

1431198.jpg

342 ms

Paper-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-1.jpg

Paper-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-1.jpg

339 ms

corecuttermachine3-2.jpg

corecuttermachine3-2.jpg

283 ms

Paper-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-2.jpg

Paper-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-2.jpg

344 ms

bopp-1.jpg

bopp-1.jpg

359 ms

Manual-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-1.jpg

Manual-Core-Cutter-Machin-300x210-1.jpg

405 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

494 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

287 ms

arrow-left.png

arrow-left.png

287 ms

Accessibility Review

corecuttermachine.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

corecuttermachine.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

corecuttermachine.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corecuttermachine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corecuttermachine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

corecuttermachine.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Core Cutter Machine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: