5.5 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.7 sec
97 ms
Visit corehub.net now to see the best up-to-date COREhub content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about corehub.net
Why COREhub? Purely Reseller-Based. We do not accept direct registration from end customers. Neutrality, our seal. Non-intrusive approach: your customers are yours. All extensions in one stop. Connect...
Visit corehub.netWe analyzed Corehub.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
corehub.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value3.9 s
52/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
13/100
10%
1751 ms
269 ms
263 ms
272 ms
548 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Corehub.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Corehub.net.
Page size can be reduced by 773.0 kB (68%)
1.1 MB
361.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Corehub.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 486.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, COREhub needs image optimization as it can save up to 146.5 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 349.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corehub.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (73%)
41
11
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of COREhub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
corehub.net
1751 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
269 ms
style.css
263 ms
styles.css
272 ms
settings.css
548 ms
popup.js
278 ms
jquery.js
715 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
396 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
683 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
935 ms
popup.css
419 ms
css
25 ms
css
36 ms
jquery.form.min.js
535 ms
scripts.js
439 ms
jquery.tweet.js
564 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
582 ms
bootstrap.min.js
794 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
703 ms
superfish.js
707 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
862 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
738 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
847 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
847 ms
testimonialrotator.js
885 ms
custom.js
926 ms
tweet.js
947 ms
bootstrap.css
997 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
859 ms
docs.css
1007 ms
prettify.css
900 ms
nivo-slider.css
935 ms
prettyPhoto.css
952 ms
options.css
1004 ms
1_px.png
157 ms
g2993-300x90.png
146 ms
mapa_nou_slogan.png
698 ms
rsz_icann-accredited.png
136 ms
logo-footer.png
746 ms
loader.gif
139 ms
shadow2.png
169 ms
bullet.png
185 ms
arr-left-hover.png
197 ms
arr-right-hover.png
279 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
19 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
45 ms
corehub.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
corehub.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
corehub.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corehub.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corehub.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
corehub.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of COREhub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: