1.9 sec in total
84 ms
1.3 sec
485 ms
Welcome to corestack.io homepage info - get ready to check Core Stack best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about corestack.io
Empowering MSPs to reduce costs, boost security and compliance, and tame multi-cloud chaos
Visit corestack.ioWe analyzed Corestack.io page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
corestack.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value24.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value4,440 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
84 ms
200 ms
24 ms
39 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Corestack.io, 50% (42 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (641 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.shortpixel.ai.
Page size can be reduced by 250.9 kB (39%)
636.9 kB
386.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Corestack.io main page is 636.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 295.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 246.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 246.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corestack.io has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (92%)
37
3
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Core Stack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
corestack.io
84 ms
www.corestack.io
200 ms
plyr.css
24 ms
svgs-attachment.css
39 ms
style.css
44 ms
css
40 ms
default.css
51 ms
style.css
36 ms
smartslider.min.css
51 ms
DOMPurify.min.js
65 ms
plyr.js
72 ms
jquery.min.js
72 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
52 ms
svgs-inline-min.js
70 ms
lottie-player.js
51 ms
n2.min.js
155 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
137 ms
ss-simple.min.js
87 ms
smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js
138 ms
player-buttons.css
153 ms
moment.min.js
152 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
153 ms
masonry.min.js
153 ms
frontend.js
151 ms
morphext.min.js
164 ms
welcomebar-front.js
164 ms
ai-2.0.min.js
164 ms
idle-timer.min.js
164 ms
custom.js
171 ms
scripts.min.js
175 ms
smoothscroll.js
183 ms
common.js
178 ms
lottie-player.js
43 ms
gtm.js
107 ms
corestack-overview-latest.gif
641 ms
widget.js
329 ms
et-divi-dynamic-24-late.css
82 ms
style.min.css
179 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
346 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
345 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
347 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
348 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
346 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
349 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
350 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
348 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
352 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
361 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTo3iQ.woff
361 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTo3ig.ttf
361 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTo3iQ.woff
362 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTo3ig.ttf
362 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTo3iQ.woff
362 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTo3ig.ttf
376 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTo3iQ.woff
376 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTo3ig.ttf
376 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDIkhdTo3iQ.woff
374 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDIkhdTo3ig.ttf
376 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTo3iQ.woff
374 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTo3ig.ttf
379 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTo3iQ.woff
378 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTo3ig.ttf
378 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTo3iQ.woff
378 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTo3ig.ttf
377 ms
modules.woff
330 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5XvVUj.woff
377 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5XvVUg.ttf
431 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4Gfy5XvVUj.woff
434 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4Gfy5XvVUg.ttf
434 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5XvVUj.woff
434 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5XvVUg.ttf
431 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5XvVUj.woff
433 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5XvVUg.ttf
435 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXvVUj.woff
435 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXvVUg.ttf
434 ms
monarch.ttf
321 ms
style.css
299 ms
widget_app_base_1725874918757.js
153 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GiClXvVUj.woff
96 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GiClXvVUg.ttf
95 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVilXvVUj.woff
92 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVilXvVUg.ttf
94 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
93 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
92 ms
corestack.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
corestack.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
corestack.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corestack.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corestack.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
corestack.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Core Stack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: