4.9 sec in total
244 ms
4.4 sec
184 ms
Visit corestaff.com now to see the best up-to-date Corestaff content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about corestaff.com
Corestaff services is now part of swipejobs. If you are looking for work or searching for temporary workers you can do this 24x7 using our advanced technology platform.
Visit corestaff.comWe analyzed Corestaff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
corestaff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.313
37/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
244 ms
356 ms
213 ms
602 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Corestaff.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Corestaff.com.
Page size can be reduced by 669.4 kB (41%)
1.6 MB
979.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Corestaff.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 865.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Corestaff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 344.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 344.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 230.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corestaff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (58%)
33
14
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Corestaff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.corestaff.com
244 ms
default.aspx
356 ms
styles-richtext.css
213 ms
corev4.css
602 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
222 ms
custom.css
434 ms
960.css
328 ms
WebResource.axd
205 ms
blank.js
211 ms
init.js
203 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
218 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
312 ms
ig-core.js
512 ms
cookiewarning4.js
106 ms
ScriptResource.axd
420 ms
ScriptResource.axd
209 ms
corestaff_logo.png
334 ms
leafstone_logo.png
857 ms
gosearch15.png
103 ms
banner1.jpg
1962 ms
banner2.jpg
788 ms
banner3.jpg
1474 ms
banner4.jpg
890 ms
banner5.jpg
2708 ms
btn-homepage-jobseekers.png
922 ms
btn-homepage-clients.png
965 ms
btn-homepage-aboutus.png
997 ms
corestaff_logo_footer.png
1031 ms
leafstone_logo_footer.png
1079 ms
icon_fb.png
1101 ms
icon_linkedin.png
1137 ms
icon_email.png
1185 ms
analytics.js
54 ms
bx_loader.gif
1903 ms
collect
12 ms
corestaff.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
corestaff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
corestaff.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corestaff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corestaff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
corestaff.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Corestaff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: