Tools & Wizards About Us
corporateexcellence.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

corporateexcellence.org

Home

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

367 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

corporateexcellence.org screenshot

About Website

Visit corporateexcellence.org now to see the best up-to-date Corporateexcellence content for Peru and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about corporateexcellence.org

Plataforma empresarial, Modelos, herramientas y formación sobre reputación, marca, comunicación, sostenibilidad e intangibles ¡Únete!

Visit corporateexcellence.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Corporateexcellence.org page load time and found that the first response time was 367 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

corporateexcellence.org performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.1

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

corporateexcellence.org

367 ms

www.corporateexcellence.org

339 ms

www.corporateexcellence.org

666 ms

en

936 ms

fbevents.js

323 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Corporateexcellence.org, 59% (47 requests) were made to Content.gnoss.ws and 6% (5 requests) were made to Static.gnoss.ws. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Content.gnoss.ws.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 405.6 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Corporateexcellence.org main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 113.7 kB

  • Original 131.4 kB
  • After minification 80.6 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 50.8 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 157.3 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Corporateexcellence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 133.7 kB

  • Original 259.5 kB
  • After minification 255.0 kB
  • After compression 125.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.7 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 952 B

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 7.4 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corporateexcellence.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 952 B or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Corporateexcellence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

corporateexcellence.org

corporateexcellence.org

367 ms

www.corporateexcellence.org

www.corporateexcellence.org

339 ms

www.corporateexcellence.org

www.corporateexcellence.org

666 ms

en

en

936 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

323 ms

idioma.css

idioma.css

820 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

618 ms

css

css

792 ms

datatables.min.css

datatables.min.css

572 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

714 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

740 ms

datatables.min.css

datatables.min.css

745 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1132 ms

responsive-calendar.css

responsive-calendar.css

1171 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

1444 ms

unificadocorporate.css

unificadocorporate.css

1174 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1124 ms

unificado.js

unificado.js

1421 ms

text.js

text.js

1144 ms

lang_en.js

lang_en.js

1160 ms

jquery.demo.js

jquery.demo.js

1143 ms

js

js

791 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

784 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

780 ms

datatables.min.js

datatables.min.js

778 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

778 ms

ScrollMagic.min.js

ScrollMagic.min.js

1149 ms

unificadocorporate.js

unificadocorporate.js

2032 ms

classic-10_7.css

classic-10_7.css

835 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

849 ms

943046455894128

943046455894128

321 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

343 ms

ga.js

ga.js

62 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

241 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

172 ms

collect

collect

375 ms

d4ca22ca-4c3c-460f-8d31-8f3e951ed0b0.png

d4ca22ca-4c3c-460f-8d31-8f3e951ed0b0.png

230 ms

logo-corporate-excellence-mobile.png

logo-corporate-excellence-mobile.png

229 ms

iconorgb.png

iconorgb.png

227 ms

logoglobal2022.png

logoglobal2022.png

793 ms

iconohome_unete.png

iconohome_unete.png

227 ms

Fondo_Card3.jpg

Fondo_Card3.jpg

504 ms

icono_atf-01.png

icono_atf-01.png

503 ms

defecto_kit_conocimiento.jpg

defecto_kit_conocimiento.jpg

1335 ms

c70b2952-e71c-78bf-9aeb-c804ef195b1d_234.png

c70b2952-e71c-78bf-9aeb-c804ef195b1d_234.png

504 ms

defecto_conocimiento.jpg

defecto_conocimiento.jpg

391 ms

c5cee110-1675-8ecd-9054-151e5964f940_234.PNG

c5cee110-1675-8ecd-9054-151e5964f940_234.PNG

818 ms

f0a2aa57-d142-46cd-9bb3-243f440faba0.jpg

f0a2aa57-d142-46cd-9bb3-243f440faba0.jpg

815 ms

logo%20bbva4.png

logo%20bbva4.png

505 ms

caixbank_o.png

caixbank_o.png

506 ms

endesa_o.png

endesa_o.png

539 ms

iberdrola_o.png

iberdrola_o.png

538 ms

naturgy_o.png

naturgy_o.png

541 ms

santander_o.png

santander_o.png

540 ms

telefonicalogonew-01.png

telefonicalogonew-01.png

749 ms

abertis_o.png

abertis_o.png

724 ms

agbarok-01.png

agbarok-01.png

750 ms

bankinter_o.png

bankinter_o.png

751 ms

cepsa_o.png

cepsa_o.png

753 ms

elcorti_o.png

elcorti_o.png

752 ms

logodamm.png

logodamm.png

754 ms

dkvg_o.png

dkvg_o.png

754 ms

gestamp_o.png

gestamp_o.png

779 ms

ibercaja_o.png

ibercaja_o.png

781 ms

ikea.png

ikea.png

779 ms

logoleroymerlinr_1.png

logoleroymerlinr_1.png

781 ms

mapfre_o.png

mapfre_o.png

782 ms

quiron_o.png

quiron_o.png

783 ms

redeia.png

redeia.png

783 ms

repsolok-01.png

repsolok-01.png

805 ms

iconokm.png

iconokm.png

1439 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

380 ms

monitor.png

monitor.png

587 ms

logognossblanco.png

logognossblanco.png

589 ms

P%C3%BAblico.jpg

P%C3%BAblico.jpg

1875 ms

481 ms

f0a2aa57-d142-46cd-9bb3-243f440faba0.jpg

f0a2aa57-d142-46cd-9bb3-243f440faba0.jpg

843 ms

c5cee110-1675-8ecd-9054-151e5964f940_234.png

c5cee110-1675-8ecd-9054-151e5964f940_234.png

816 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

781 ms

57 ms

Accessibility Review

corporateexcellence.org accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

corporateexcellence.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

corporateexcellence.org SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corporateexcellence.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corporateexcellence.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

corporateexcellence.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Corporateexcellence. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: