957 ms in total
105 ms
797 ms
55 ms
Click here to check amazing Cosmetic Safety Assessment content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cosmeticsafetyassessment.com
We produce Cosmetic Product Safety Reports specifically for small-scale and craft clients. Our service is completely confidential, supportive and cost effective. We are happy to provide free quotation...
Visit cosmeticsafetyassessment.comWe analyzed Cosmeticsafetyassessment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 852 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
cosmeticsafetyassessment.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value2,350 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
105 ms
42 ms
40 ms
40 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cosmeticsafetyassessment.com, 43% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 764.6 kB (60%)
1.3 MB
506.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Cosmeticsafetyassessment.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 862.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 693.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 693.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 699 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cosmetic Safety Assessment images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 70.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)
23
11
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cosmetic Safety Assessment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cosmeticsafetyassessment.com
105 ms
minified.js
42 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
40 ms
polyfill.min.js
40 ms
smile-wix.js
30 ms
thunderbolt-commons.01a1d4ab.bundle.min.js
134 ms
main.869ae2a5.bundle.min.js
134 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
134 ms
lodash.min.js
133 ms
react.production.min.js
131 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
146 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
146 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
157 ms
Teal%20Outline.png
226 ms
bundle.min.js
60 ms
cb42fe_2906978c8c1e4bbfa8872ce3b9f993c1~mv2.png
412 ms
Natural%20skincare.jpg
376 ms
nsplsh_be5d986740b040848f7912bd6011ce3b~mv2.jpg
325 ms
cb42fe_5e0252a90e524d9cbe9a335fd38243e1~mv2.jpg
295 ms
login%20icon%20website.jpg
322 ms
132 ms
124 ms
130 ms
124 ms
122 ms
122 ms
175 ms
240 ms
238 ms
239 ms
238 ms
167 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
11 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
11 ms
9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
6 ms
aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
4 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
21 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
8 ms
cosmeticsafetyassessment.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
cosmeticsafetyassessment.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cosmeticsafetyassessment.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cosmeticsafetyassessment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cosmeticsafetyassessment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cosmeticsafetyassessment.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cosmetic Safety Assessment. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: