Tools & Wizards About Us
costcomparisonhelper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

costcomparisonhelper.com

Cost Comparison Helper - Average Cost Information And Free Price Quotes

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

costcomparisonhelper.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to costcomparisonhelper.com homepage info - get ready to check Cost Comparison Helper best content right away, or after learning these important things about costcomparisonhelper.com

Cost Comparison Helper - Buying Advice - Free Pricing Articles - How Much Do Business Products/Services Cost? Save time and money when searching for your next product or service.

Visit costcomparisonhelper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Costcomparisonhelper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

costcomparisonhelper.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

costcomparisonhelper.com

206 ms

costcomparisonhelper.com

326 ms

all.css

311 ms

fontawesome.css

346 ms

style.css

318 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Costcomparisonhelper.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Costcomparisonhelper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 508.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Costcomparisonhelper.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 20.9 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cost Comparison Helper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 114.3 kB

  • Original 186.3 kB
  • After minification 184.0 kB
  • After compression 72.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 114.3 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 363.2 kB

  • Original 432.6 kB
  • After minification 378.7 kB
  • After compression 69.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costcomparisonhelper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 363.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (61%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cost Comparison Helper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

costcomparisonhelper.com

costcomparisonhelper.com

206 ms

costcomparisonhelper.com

costcomparisonhelper.com

326 ms

all.css

all.css

311 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

346 ms

style.css

style.css

318 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

466 ms

animate.css

animate.css

396 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

225 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

39 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

54 ms

all.css

all.css

190 ms

js

js

56 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

530 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

399 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

340 ms

custom.js

custom.js

359 ms

owl-slider.js

owl-slider.js

562 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

131 ms

cost-comparison-helper.jpg

cost-comparison-helper.jpg

807 ms

about-cost-comparison-helper.jpg

about-cost-comparison-helper.jpg

1570 ms

business-phone-systems.jpg

business-phone-systems.jpg

773 ms

atm-machine-leases.jpg

atm-machine-leases.jpg

783 ms

payroll-services.jpg

payroll-services.jpg

732 ms

cost-comparison-services.jpg

cost-comparison-services.jpg

808 ms

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

827 ms

OpenSans-SemiBold.ttf

OpenSans-SemiBold.ttf

875 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

93 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

42 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

773 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

134 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

785 ms

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

920 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

166 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

65 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

893 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

110 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

121 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

133 ms

fa-solid-900.svg

fa-solid-900.svg

170 ms

fa-regular-400.svg

fa-regular-400.svg

157 ms

fa-brands-400.svg

fa-brands-400.svg

286 ms

SEO Factors

costcomparisonhelper.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costcomparisonhelper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Costcomparisonhelper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

costcomparisonhelper.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cost Comparison Helper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: