Tools & Wizards About Us
costlaw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

costlaw.com

Cost Law Services Limited | Cost Law Services | Cost Law

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

331 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

207 ms

costlaw.com screenshot

About Website

Visit costlaw.com now to see the best up-to-date Cost Law content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about costlaw.com

Specialist Cost Lawyers and Law Costs Draftsmen, based over multiple offices, with a niche for bespoke legal services and outstanding levels of personal service

Visit costlaw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Costlaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

costlaw.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.217

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

costlaw.com

331 ms

www.costlaw.com

369 ms

css

37 ms

site.min.css

84 ms

bootstrap.min.css

265 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Costlaw.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (733 ms) belongs to the original domain Costlaw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Costlaw.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 26.6 kB

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 62.3 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cost Law images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 60.3 kB
  • After compression 47.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costlaw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (33%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cost Law. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

costlaw.com

costlaw.com

331 ms

www.costlaw.com

www.costlaw.com

369 ms

css

css

37 ms

site.min.css

site.min.css

84 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

265 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

329 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

502 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

413 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

347 ms

css

css

53 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

348 ms

js

js

51 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

33 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

348 ms

Costlaw-Logo_Final.png

Costlaw-Logo_Final.png

83 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

404 ms

banner1_M.jpg

banner1_M.jpg

403 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

244 ms

banner2_M.jpg

banner2_M.jpg

402 ms

banner4.jpg

banner4.jpg

489 ms

banner4_M.jpg

banner4_M.jpg

405 ms

banner5.jpg

banner5.jpg

733 ms

banner5_M.jpg

banner5_M.jpg

571 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

486 ms

banner3_M.jpg

banner3_M.jpg

571 ms

box4.jpg

box4.jpg

486 ms

box1.jpg

box1.jpg

567 ms

box3.jpg

box3.jpg

568 ms

box2.jpg

box2.jpg

571 ms

box5.jpg

box5.jpg

651 ms

box6.jpg

box6.jpg

650 ms

box7.jpg

box7.jpg

655 ms

box8.jpg

box8.jpg

652 ms

box9.jpg

box9.jpg

656 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

693 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

690 ms

-F6xfjBsISg9aMakPm3wpg.ttf

-F6xfjBsISg9aMakPm3wpg.ttf

16 ms

light-bottom.css

light-bottom.css

16 ms

Accessibility Review

costlaw.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

costlaw.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

costlaw.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costlaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Costlaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

costlaw.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cost Law. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: