Tools & Wizards About Us
cothamtechnologies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

cothamtechnologies.com

FloFrame | No Code Enterprise Mobile App Development

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

757 ms

Page Rendered

340 ms

cothamtechnologies.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cothamtechnologies.com homepage info - get ready to check Cothamtechnologies best content right away, or after learning these important things about cothamtechnologies.com

The FloFrame innovative no code technology provides the easiest and fastest way to build beautiful and powerful native mobile apps.

Visit cothamtechnologies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cothamtechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cothamtechnologies.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,520 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cothamtechnologies.com

94 ms

css2

82 ms

legacy.js

61 ms

modern.js

71 ms

extract-css-runtime-a3a2741fb711753f48de-min.en-US.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cothamtechnologies.com, 47% (14 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 37% (11 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (21%)

Content Size

10.0 MB

After Optimization

7.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cothamtechnologies.com main page is 10.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 243.5 kB

  • Original 280.0 kB
  • After minification 259.7 kB
  • After compression 36.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 243.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 716.3 kB

  • Original 7.5 MB
  • After minification 6.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cothamtechnologies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB
  • After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cothamtechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (45%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cothamtechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cothamtechnologies.com

www.cothamtechnologies.com

94 ms

css2

css2

82 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

61 ms

modern.js

modern.js

71 ms

extract-css-runtime-a3a2741fb711753f48de-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-a3a2741fb711753f48de-min.en-US.js

63 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

86 ms

cldr-resource-pack-e85130cf44bc2d365b8b-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-e85130cf44bc2d365b8b-min.en-US.js

67 ms

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

86 ms

common-vendors-8db852056516153189c0-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-8db852056516153189c0-min.en-US.js

237 ms

common-11e18ea65739225beb15-min.en-US.js

common-11e18ea65739225beb15-min.en-US.js

239 ms

user-account-core-a70d9fed318741849331-min.en-US.js

user-account-core-a70d9fed318741849331-min.en-US.js

76 ms

user-account-core-b6e8cafbf34b05da5c2b-min.en-US.css

user-account-core-b6e8cafbf34b05da5c2b-min.en-US.css

74 ms

performance-74d24f5c2adcf3b8ee8a-min.en-US.js

performance-74d24f5c2adcf3b8ee8a-min.en-US.js

78 ms

site.css

site.css

84 ms

static.css

static.css

67 ms

site-bundle.11fff701a22dbd232e9127391845b3e2.js

site-bundle.11fff701a22dbd232e9127391845b3e2.js

64 ms

CTL-Logo-white-500w.png

CTL-Logo-white-500w.png

286 ms

image-asset.jpeg

image-asset.jpeg

53 ms

UK+Utilities+Water+Monitoring+-+Home.png

UK+Utilities+Water+Monitoring+-+Home.png

377 ms

image-asset.jpeg

image-asset.jpeg

51 ms

image-asset.jpeg

image-asset.jpeg

54 ms

image-asset.jpeg

image-asset.jpeg

55 ms

New+AI+Project+Selected.png

New+AI+Project+Selected.png

56 ms

Simulator+Screen+Shot+-+iPhone+14+Plus+-+2024-05-25+at+08.52.15.png

Simulator+Screen+Shot+-+iPhone+14+Plus+-+2024-05-25+at+08.52.15.png

59 ms

UK+Utilities+Water+Monitoring+-+Home+Screen+Run.png

UK+Utilities+Water+Monitoring+-+Home+Screen+Run.png

61 ms

image-asset.jpeg

image-asset.jpeg

61 ms

SG_VenueMap.PNG

SG_VenueMap.PNG

261 ms

IB_WheelAssets.jpeg

IB_WheelAssets.jpeg

62 ms

TG_DriverFuelLevel.jpeg

TG_DriverFuelLevel.jpeg

64 ms

Martian+House+Interface.png

Martian+House+Interface.png

241 ms

Accessibility Review

cothamtechnologies.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cothamtechnologies.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cothamtechnologies.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cothamtechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cothamtechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cothamtechnologies.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cothamtechnologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: