Access cottonwoodweb.com. Cottonwood AZ web design, Sedona Arizona Web Design

Report Summary

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cottonwood Web content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cottonwoodweb.com

Web design in Cottonwood Arizona and Sedona Arizona, Affordable low cost web sites promote your business with webdesign in the Cottonwood and Sedona Arizona

Visit cottonwoodweb.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

cottonwoodweb.com

31 ms

www.cottonwoodweb.com

1524 ms

style.min.css

21 ms

all.min.css

14 ms

178-layout.css

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Cottonwoodweb.com, 41% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cottonwoodweb.com.

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Cottonwoodweb.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 146.3 kB

Original 173.2 kB
After minification 171.1 kB
After compression 26.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

Original 3.9 MB
After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cottonwood Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 298.6 kB

Original 415.3 kB
After minification 414.7 kB
After compression 116.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 200.9 kB

Original 236.9 kB
After minification 234.9 kB
After compression 36.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cottonwoodweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 200.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cottonwood Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cottonwoodweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cottonwoodweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cottonwoodweb.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cottonwood Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Cottonwood AZ web design, Sedona Arizona Web Design

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)