3.7 sec in total
551 ms
2.6 sec
512 ms
Welcome to counterchallenge.com homepage info - get ready to check Counterchallenge best content right away, or after learning these important things about counterchallenge.com
Visit counterchallenge.comWe analyzed Counterchallenge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 551 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
counterchallenge.com performance score
551 ms
27 ms
289 ms
408 ms
798 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Counterchallenge.com, 48% (11 requests) were made to Counterchallenge.co.uk and 43% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Counterchallenge.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 175.6 kB (14%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Counterchallenge.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Counterchallenge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 74.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Counterchallenge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)
12
7
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Counterchallenge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
counterchallenge.com
551 ms
css
27 ms
icons.style.css
289 ms
style.css
408 ms
jquery.js
798 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
519 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
499 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
507 ms
jquery.blur.min.js
508 ms
jquery.frontend.min.js
524 ms
cclogo.png
673 ms
CC-bg-wood.jpg
1220 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
12 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
12 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
11 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
13 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
14 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
15 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
22 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
23 ms
general_foundicons.woff
159 ms
counterchallenge.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Counterchallenge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Counterchallenge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
counterchallenge.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Counterchallenge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: