Tools & Wizards About Us
coverageopinions.info screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

coverageopinions.info

Coverage Opinions - Judicial Opinions Today - Impact On Counsel's Opinions Tomorrow

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

260 ms

coverageopinions.info screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Coverage Opinions content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coverageopinions.info

Coverage Opinions is a bi-weekly electronic newsletter reporting and providing commentary on just-issued decisions from courts nationally addressing insurance coverage disputes. Coverage Opinions focu...

Visit coverageopinions.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Coverageopinions.info page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coverageopinions.info performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

coverageopinions.info

146 ms

www.coverageopinions.info

235 ms

styles.css

59 ms

headerHome.jpg

170 ms

TwitterLargeShadow.jpg

168 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Coverageopinions.info and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (557 ms) belongs to the original domain Coverageopinions.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.6 kB (1%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Coverageopinions.info main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 955 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coverage Opinions images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 102 B

  • Original 707 B
  • After minification 707 B
  • After compression 605 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coverageopinions.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

41

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coverage Opinions. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

coverageopinions.info

coverageopinions.info

146 ms

www.coverageopinions.info

www.coverageopinions.info

235 ms

styles.css

styles.css

59 ms

headerHome.jpg

headerHome.jpg

170 ms

TwitterLargeShadow.jpg

TwitterLargeShadow.jpg

168 ms

header-end.jpg

header-end.jpg

170 ms

headerWithBanner.jpg

headerWithBanner.jpg

278 ms

home1.jpg

home1.jpg

173 ms

publication1.jpg

publication1.jpg

174 ms

Editor1.jpg

Editor1.jpg

223 ms

Contact1.jpg

Contact1.jpg

227 ms

ArchivesBtn1.jpg

ArchivesBtn1.jpg

226 ms

KeyIssues1.jpg

KeyIssues1.jpg

230 ms

Subscribe1.jpg

Subscribe1.jpg

230 ms

CurrentIssueNav1.jpg

CurrentIssueNav1.jpg

280 ms

CLEButton1.jpg

CLEButton1.jpg

283 ms

RandyBtnNEW1.jpg

RandyBtnNEW1.jpg

281 ms

trans-spacer-6pix.gif

trans-spacer-6pix.gif

283 ms

JudgeNewer2.jpg

JudgeNewer2.jpg

389 ms

ViewSubscribeBtns.jpg

ViewSubscribeBtns.jpg

334 ms

NEWHomeBtns.jpg

NEWHomeBtns.jpg

335 ms

JohnGrishamHOME.jpg

JohnGrishamHOME.jpg

549 ms

QuickLinks2023New.jpg

QuickLinks2023New.jpg

499 ms

HOMEPreetBharara.jpg

HOMEPreetBharara.jpg

390 ms

HOMEChrisDodd.jpg

HOMEChrisDodd.jpg

444 ms

HOMEVernonJordan.jpg

HOMEVernonJordan.jpg

443 ms

HOMEinterviewDanAbrams2.jpg

HOMEinterviewDanAbrams2.jpg

498 ms

WebsiteBy.jpg

WebsiteBy.jpg

448 ms

Copyright.jpg

Copyright.jpg

505 ms

SiteBG.jpg

SiteBG.jpg

450 ms

HOMEBG2023.jpg

HOMEBG2023.jpg

557 ms

WebsiteBy2.jpg

WebsiteBy2.jpg

59 ms

TwitterLarge2.jpg

TwitterLarge2.jpg

57 ms

home2.jpg

home2.jpg

57 ms

publication2.jpg

publication2.jpg

59 ms

Editor2.jpg

Editor2.jpg

58 ms

Contact2.jpg

Contact2.jpg

57 ms

ArchivesBtn2.jpg

ArchivesBtn2.jpg

112 ms

KeyIssues2.jpg

KeyIssues2.jpg

112 ms

Subscribe2.jpg

Subscribe2.jpg

113 ms

CurrentIssueNav2.jpg

CurrentIssueNav2.jpg

112 ms

RandyBtnNEW2.jpg

RandyBtnNEW2.jpg

115 ms

CLEButton2.jpg

CLEButton2.jpg

113 ms

Accessibility Review

coverageopinions.info accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

coverageopinions.info best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

coverageopinions.info SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coverageopinions.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Coverageopinions.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coverageopinions.info

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coverage Opinions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: