Tools & Wizards About Us
coverduck.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

coverduck.com

Hot Tub Covers For Sale-Cheap replacement hot tub covers and spa covers

Page Load Speed

11.7 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

10.5 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

coverduck.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to coverduck.com homepage info - get ready to check Coverduck best content right away, or after learning these important things about coverduck.com

Your No. 1 replacement hot tub cover and spa cover provider. For locally made cheap hot tub covers and spa covers for sale, Cover Duck is your last stop.

Visit coverduck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Coverduck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coverduck.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

coverduck.com

1095 ms

coverduck.com

6418 ms

bootstrap.full.min.css

63 ms

edifice.css

92 ms

style.css

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Coverduck.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.foxycart.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Coverduck.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

495.3 kB

After Optimization

377.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Coverduck.com main page is 495.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 187.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.8 kB

  • Original 35.5 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 178.2 kB
  • After minification 156.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Coverduck needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 187.4 kB
  • After minification 187.2 kB
  • After compression 133.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 94.2 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 79.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coverduck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (51%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coverduck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

coverduck.com

coverduck.com

1095 ms

coverduck.com

coverduck.com

6418 ms

bootstrap.full.min.css

bootstrap.full.min.css

63 ms

edifice.css

edifice.css

92 ms

style.css

style.css

116 ms

cycle.js

cycle.js

158 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

wp-customer-reviews.css

185 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

223 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

486 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

530 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

567 ms

wp-customer-reviews.js

wp-customer-reviews.js

605 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

23 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

foxycart.colorbox.js

foxycart.colorbox.js

29 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

646 ms

frontend_style.css

frontend_style.css

682 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

710 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

738 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

762 ms

theme_utils.js

theme_utils.js

801 ms

frontend_script.js

frontend_script.js

833 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

862 ms

css

css

23 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

741 ms

header_logo.png

header_logo.png

1073 ms

order_btn.png

order_btn.png

339 ms

cover-image2.png

cover-image2.png

406 ms

1_large5105363dc2dd9-160x120.jpg

1_large5105363dc2dd9-160x120.jpg

440 ms

5_large5105363e0ad74-160x120.jpg

5_large5105363e0ad74-160x120.jpg

462 ms

4_large5105363e41189-160x120.jpg

4_large5105363e41189-160x120.jpg

461 ms

6_large5105363ebd860-160x120.jpg

6_large5105363ebd860-160x120.jpg

475 ms

bradmail.jpg

bradmail.jpg

481 ms

footerlogo.png

footerlogo.png

458 ms

nav_bg.png

nav_bg.png

457 ms

menu_border.png

menu_border.png

486 ms

header_shadow.png

header_shadow.png

472 ms

checkout-header.png

checkout-header.png

473 ms

main.png

main.png

502 ms

footer_bottom.png

footer_bottom.png

493 ms

newstars.png

newstars.png

490 ms

footer_strip.png

footer_strip.png

496 ms

footer-divider.png

footer-divider.png

516 ms

ga.js

ga.js

15 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaw.woff

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaw.woff

11 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

cart.php

cart.php

103 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

8 ms

header_logo.png

header_logo.png

1258 ms

Accessibility Review

coverduck.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

coverduck.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

coverduck.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coverduck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coverduck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coverduck.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coverduck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: