Tools & Wizards About Us
covernet.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

covernet.net

Cover Net S.L

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

283 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

460 ms

covernet.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to covernet.net homepage info - get ready to check Cover Net best content right away, or after learning these important things about covernet.net

Ofreciendo servicios de Informática , Instalaciones, reparaciones, mantenimiento y comunicaciones desde 1997

Visit covernet.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Covernet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 283 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

covernet.net performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,820 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

covernet.net

283 ms

covernet.es

4672 ms

autoptimize_300c842338b8ba6f3cabe7ccdef9ee2b.css

357 ms

css

32 ms

css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Covernet.net, 49% (22 requests) were made to Covernet.es and 22% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) relates to the external source Covernet.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 237.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Covernet.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 631.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 55.5 kB
  • After minification 53.7 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 161.6 kB

  • Original 631.1 kB
  • After minification 469.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cover Net needs image optimization as it can save up to 161.6 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 618.0 kB
  • After minification 618.0 kB
  • After compression 584.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 70 B

  • Original 125.4 kB
  • After minification 125.4 kB
  • After compression 125.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Covernet.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (44%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cover Net. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

covernet.net

covernet.net

283 ms

covernet.es

covernet.es

4672 ms

autoptimize_300c842338b8ba6f3cabe7ccdef9ee2b.css

autoptimize_300c842338b8ba6f3cabe7ccdef9ee2b.css

357 ms

css

css

32 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

53 ms

autoptimize_single_49edccea2e7ba985cadc9ba0531cbed1.js

autoptimize_single_49edccea2e7ba985cadc9ba0531cbed1.js

387 ms

revolution.tools.min.js

revolution.tools.min.js

509 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

504 ms

css

css

56 ms

api.js

api.js

82 ms

autoptimize_c06b713c0485952003022bbfed01d086.js

autoptimize_c06b713c0485952003022bbfed01d086.js

709 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

69 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

281 ms

covernet.png

covernet.png

160 ms

Banner_1.jpg

Banner_1.jpg

331 ms

embed

embed

315 ms

Banda_1.jpg

Banda_1.jpg

297 ms

Mantenimiento_1.png

Mantenimiento_1.png

299 ms

Banda_2.jpg

Banda_2.jpg

246 ms

Soluciones_2.png

Soluciones_2.png

297 ms

Banda_3.jpg

Banda_3.jpg

297 ms

Hardware_1.png

Hardware_1.png

375 ms

Banda_4.jpg

Banda_4.jpg

374 ms

Seguridad_1.png

Seguridad_1.png

375 ms

prueba-1.png

prueba-1.png

375 ms

Tienda.png

Tienda.png

380 ms

Diseno.png

Diseno.png

380 ms

Posicionamiento.png

Posicionamiento.png

387 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

35 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

82 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

215 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

216 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

260 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

215 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

216 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

260 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

258 ms

mfn-icons.woff

mfn-icons.woff

442 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

259 ms

collect

collect

71 ms

js

js

175 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

239 ms

js

js

118 ms

Accessibility Review

covernet.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

covernet.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

covernet.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Covernet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Covernet.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

covernet.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cover Net. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: