Tools & Wizards About Us
cox-net.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

cox-net.com

Parakaleo - Paul & Donna Cox Missionaries to Africa

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

97 ms

cox-net.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cox-net.com now to see the best up-to-date Cox Net content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cox-net.com

Paul and Donna Cox are missionaries living and working in Kenya with Africa Theological Seminary (ATS) which is a ministry of International Christian Ministries (ICM). There children are Nehemiah, Mic...

Visit cox-net.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cox-net.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cox-net.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cox-net.com

146 ms

cox-net.com

269 ms

text.css

64 ms

layout1_01.jpg

76 ms

layout1_02.jpg

204 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Cox-net.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (803 ms) belongs to the original domain Cox-net.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.0 kB (6%)

Content Size

537.6 kB

After Optimization

507.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cox-net.com main page is 537.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 524.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 12.3 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 524.0 kB
  • After minification 503.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cox Net images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 47 B

  • Original 350 B
  • After minification 350 B
  • After compression 303 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cox-net.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47 B or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (18%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

41

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cox Net. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cox-net.com

cox-net.com

146 ms

cox-net.com

cox-net.com

269 ms

text.css

text.css

64 ms

layout1_01.jpg

layout1_01.jpg

76 ms

layout1_02.jpg

layout1_02.jpg

204 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

238 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

298 ms

layout1_04.jpg

layout1_04.jpg

216 ms

layout1_05.jpg

layout1_05.jpg

208 ms

layout1_06.gif

layout1_06.gif

207 ms

blog_01.gif

blog_01.gif

267 ms

blog_02.gif

blog_02.gif

271 ms

blog_03.gif

blog_03.gif

270 ms

layout1_08.jpg

layout1_08.jpg

275 ms

sidell.jpg

sidell.jpg

299 ms

layout1_09.jpg

layout1_09.jpg

330 ms

lside.gif

lside.gif

332 ms

menu2_01.gif

menu2_01.gif

333 ms

menu2_02.gif

menu2_02.gif

336 ms

menu2_03.gif

menu2_03.gif

358 ms

menu2_04.gif

menu2_04.gif

359 ms

menu2_05.gif

menu2_05.gif

392 ms

menu2_06.gif

menu2_06.gif

392 ms

menu2_07.gif

menu2_07.gif

396 ms

menu2_08.gif

menu2_08.gif

395 ms

menu2_09.gif

menu2_09.gif

420 ms

menu2_10.gif

menu2_10.gif

419 ms

menu2_11.gif

menu2_11.gif

455 ms

menu2_12.gif

menu2_12.gif

456 ms

cox-fam-2020.jpg

cox-fam-2020.jpg

803 ms

bar.jpg

bar.jpg

457 ms

rside.jpg

rside.jpg

481 ms

layout1_12.jpg

layout1_12.jpg

481 ms

layout1_13.jpg

layout1_13.jpg

516 ms

layout1_14.jpg

layout1_14.jpg

519 ms

layout1_15.jpg

layout1_15.jpg

518 ms

layout1_16.jpg

layout1_16.jpg

546 ms

afritubu.ttf

afritubu.ttf

355 ms

menu2O_01.gif

menu2O_01.gif

68 ms

menu2O_02.gif

menu2O_02.gif

64 ms

menu2O_03.gif

menu2O_03.gif

67 ms

menu2O_04.gif

menu2O_04.gif

64 ms

menu2O_05.gif

menu2O_05.gif

63 ms

menu2O_06.gif

menu2O_06.gif

75 ms

menu2O_07.gif

menu2O_07.gif

126 ms

menu2O_08.gif

menu2O_08.gif

126 ms

menu2O_09.gif

menu2O_09.gif

129 ms

menu2O_10.gif

menu2O_10.gif

131 ms

menu2O_12.gif

menu2O_12.gif

131 ms

blogO_02.gif

blogO_02.gif

148 ms

blogO_03.gif

blogO_03.gif

189 ms

blogO_04.gif

blogO_04.gif

188 ms

blog_04.gif

blog_04.gif

191 ms

Accessibility Review

cox-net.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

cox-net.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

cox-net.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cox-net.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cox-net.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

cox-net.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cox Net. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: