Tools & Wizards About Us
coxfire.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

coxfire.com

Cox Fire Protection | Florida Fire Sprinkler Contractor

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

733 ms

coxfire.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to coxfire.com homepage info - get ready to check Cox Fire best content right away, or after learning these important things about coxfire.com

For over 30 years, Cox Fire has provided fire protection services including installation, service, inspection, alarms, and extinguishers across Florida

Visit coxfire.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Coxfire.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coxfire.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.34

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

coxfire.com

133 ms

coxfire.com

292 ms

style.min.css

107 ms

css

30 ms

renew.css

210 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Coxfire.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (511 ms) belongs to the original domain Coxfire.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (57%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Coxfire.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 118.4 kB

  • Original 144.2 kB
  • After minification 143.0 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 2.4 MB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cox Fire needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 56% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 67 B

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 30.1 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (53%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cox Fire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

coxfire.com

coxfire.com

133 ms

coxfire.com

coxfire.com

292 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

107 ms

css

css

30 ms

renew.css

renew.css

210 ms

style.css

style.css

155 ms

settings.css

settings.css

157 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

155 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

159 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

116 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

188 ms

page.js

page.js

42 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

205 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

290 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

403 ms

tptools.js

tptools.js

290 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

288 ms

cs-classic.7.4.18.js

cs-classic.7.4.18.js

401 ms

x.js

x.js

288 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

401 ms

esg.min.js

esg.min.js

401 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

400 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

215 ms

Cox-Fire-Protection-Logo-1.png

Cox-Fire-Protection-Logo-1.png

336 ms

hero.jpeg

hero.jpeg

490 ms

service.png

service.png

489 ms

install.png

install.png

490 ms

alarms.png

alarms.png

489 ms

extinguisher.png

extinguisher.png

488 ms

Pye-Barker-Proud.png

Pye-Barker-Proud.png

200 ms

IMG_3287.png

IMG_3287.png

491 ms

Scan1_0001_001.jpg

Scan1_0001_001.jpg

370 ms

onebucplace03.jpg

onebucplace03.jpg

323 ms

steinbrennerfield01-2.jpg

steinbrennerfield01-2.jpg

370 ms

premierbev02.jpg

premierbev02.jpg

367 ms

mosi01.jpg

mosi01.jpg

318 ms

lemeridien02.jpg

lemeridien02.jpg

486 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

128 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

128 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

191 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

192 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

511 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

415 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

279 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

74 ms

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

112 ms

coxfire.com

coxfire.com

243 ms

inspections.jpeg

inspections.jpeg

223 ms

water-test.jpeg

water-test.jpeg

420 ms

Accessibility Review

coxfire.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

coxfire.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

coxfire.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coxfire.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coxfire.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coxfire.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cox Fire. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: