Tools & Wizards About Us
cpfh.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

cpfh.org

The Center for Postpartum Family Health | Counseling | Houston, TX

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

39 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

590 ms

cpfh.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cpfh content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cpfh.org

The Center for Postpartum Family Health, Houston, Texas helps couples, individuals, mothers, & families w/ depression, anxiety, & perinatal mood disorders

Visit cpfh.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cpfh.org page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cpfh.org performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,530 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cpfh.org

39 ms

cpfh.org

128 ms

js

146 ms

css2

182 ms

bxslider.css

143 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cpfh.org, 42% (21 requests) were made to Brightervisionthemeassetsprod.com and 16% (8 requests) were made to Brightervisionclients.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (901 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 92.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cpfh.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 639.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 65.2 kB

  • Original 77.2 kB
  • After minification 75.4 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 639.5 kB
  • After minification 629.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cpfh images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 481.6 kB
  • After minification 481.4 kB
  • After compression 467.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 70.8 kB
  • After minification 70.4 kB
  • After compression 67.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cpfh.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cpfh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cpfh.org

cpfh.org

39 ms

cpfh.org

cpfh.org

128 ms

js

js

146 ms

css2

css2

182 ms

bxslider.css

bxslider.css

143 ms

jarallax.css

jarallax.css

179 ms

style.css

style.css

180 ms

main.css

main.css

177 ms

all.css

all.css

188 ms

wpforms-full.css

wpforms-full.css

171 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

170 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

186 ms

place

place

533 ms

place

place

901 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

202 ms

json5.js

json5.js

200 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

196 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

196 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

195 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

194 ms

scroll-lock.js

scroll-lock.js

195 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

194 ms

jarallax-video.min.js

jarallax-video.min.js

195 ms

object-fit.js

object-fit.js

197 ms

TweenMax.js

TweenMax.js

196 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

194 ms

print.min.js

print.min.js

196 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

196 ms

bvcmsForms.min.js

bvcmsForms.min.js

197 ms

api.js

api.js

548 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

27 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

113 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

161 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

91 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

141 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

128 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

115 ms

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

fb639531-1408-5ca9-90bb-1d0370501c61

117 ms

font

font

29 ms

font

font

53 ms

font

font

65 ms

font

font

66 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

22 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

63 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

64 ms

js

js

81 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

28 ms

search.js

search.js

4 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

cpfh.org accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cpfh.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cpfh.org SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cpfh.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cpfh.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cpfh.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cpfh. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: