Tools & Wizards About Us
cpu-comparison.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cpu-comparison.com

CPU Comparison - Compare, benchmarks, and technical specs of processors

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

344 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

616 ms

cpu-comparison.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cpu-comparison.com homepage info - get ready to check CPU Comparison best content for Vietnam right away, or after learning these important things about cpu-comparison.com

Looking for your best next computer processor or just want to compare CPUs head to head? CPU-Comparison is the best CPU compare tool in the world trusted by millions of users, help you find out which ...

Visit cpu-comparison.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cpu-comparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 344 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cpu-comparison.com performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cpu-comparison.com

344 ms

cpu.min.css

10 ms

cpu-search.css

24 ms

cpu.min.js

36 ms

cpu-search.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Cpu-comparison.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (378 ms) belongs to the original domain Cpu-comparison.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

658.1 kB

After Optimization

555.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cpu-comparison.com main page is 658.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 373.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 64.1 kB
  • After minification 64.1 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 190.6 kB
  • After minification 172.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CPU Comparison images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 106 B

  • Original 373.7 kB
  • After minification 373.7 kB
  • After compression 373.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-98%

Potential reduce by 29.2 kB

  • Original 29.7 kB
  • After minification 513 B
  • After compression 501 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cpu-comparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 98% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (28%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CPU Comparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cpu-comparison.com

cpu-comparison.com

344 ms

cpu.min.css

cpu.min.css

10 ms

cpu-search.css

cpu-search.css

24 ms

cpu.min.js

cpu.min.js

36 ms

cpu-search.js

cpu-search.js

68 ms

adsense-lazyload.min.js

adsense-lazyload.min.js

133 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

324 ms

ga.js

ga.js

134 ms

logo@2x.png

logo@2x.png

132 ms

Shape.png

Shape.png

133 ms

icons-search@2x.png

icons-search@2x.png

133 ms

icons-check@2x.png

icons-check@2x.png

155 ms

logo-bn.png

logo-bn.png

152 ms

logo-vertical.png

logo-vertical.png

156 ms

illustration-cpu.png

illustration-cpu.png

152 ms

illustration-lap.png

illustration-lap.png

378 ms

icons-uncheck@2x.png

icons-uncheck@2x.png

153 ms

logo-intel.png

logo-intel.png

155 ms

logo-amd.png

logo-amd.png

322 ms

benchmarks-2.png

benchmarks-2.png

156 ms

svg-icon-to-top.svg

svg-icon-to-top.svg

157 ms

coins.png

coins.png

127 ms

intel-core-i3-11340-cpm.png

intel-core-i3-11340-cpm.png

30 ms

apple-m2-ultra-76-gpu.png

apple-m2-ultra-76-gpu.png

282 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

16 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

48 ms

js

js

81 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

377 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

19 ms

Accessibility Review

cpu-comparison.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

cpu-comparison.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cpu-comparison.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cpu-comparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cpu-comparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cpu-comparison.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CPU Comparison. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: