Tools & Wizards About Us
craftingsoftware.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

craftingsoftware.com

Erlang & Elixir expertise | Product UX/UI & development | Crafting Software

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

793 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

63 ms

craftingsoftware.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to craftingsoftware.com homepage info - get ready to check Crafting Software best content right away, or after learning these important things about craftingsoftware.com

We are Crafting Software. We love to craft web and mobile apps for fintech, real estate, health, education and entertainment industries. We specialise in Elixir and Erlang Development as well as JavaS...

Visit craftingsoftware.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Craftingsoftware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 793 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

craftingsoftware.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,890 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.143

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.craftingsoftware.com

793 ms

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

78 ms

polyfill.min.js

961 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b790d5df.bundle.min.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Craftingsoftware.com, 40% (19 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 27% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (961 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 745.2 kB (51%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

725.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Craftingsoftware.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 759.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 631.3 kB

  • Original 759.4 kB
  • After minification 757.7 kB
  • After compression 128.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 631.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 60.1 kB

  • Original 407.7 kB
  • After minification 347.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Crafting Software needs image optimization as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 53.8 kB

  • Original 303.4 kB
  • After minification 303.4 kB
  • After compression 249.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (32%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crafting Software. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.craftingsoftware.com

www.craftingsoftware.com

793 ms

minified.js

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

78 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

961 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b790d5df.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b790d5df.bundle.min.js

6 ms

main.c07e8381.bundle.min.js

main.c07e8381.bundle.min.js

7 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

11 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

13 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

12 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

14 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

4 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

5 ms

landing%20page%20-%203440%20-%202x.png

landing%20page%20-%203440%20-%202x.png

331 ms

landing%20page%20-%201024%20-%202x.png

landing%20page%20-%201024%20-%202x.png

241 ms

landing%20page%20-%20680%20-%202x.png

landing%20page%20-%20680%20-%202x.png

432 ms

landing%20page%20-%20480%20-%202x.png

landing%20page%20-%20480%20-%202x.png

287 ms

6dcc8c_64a8fd05e4a04149938a9e12f7a8b822~mv2.png

6dcc8c_64a8fd05e4a04149938a9e12f7a8b822~mv2.png

292 ms

6dcc8c_a468230aa4a74a7893fbada133d764d7~mv2.png

6dcc8c_a468230aa4a74a7893fbada133d764d7~mv2.png

351 ms

6dcc8c_21905b2007f94ce99b7b507860ec1840~mv2.png

6dcc8c_21905b2007f94ce99b7b507860ec1840~mv2.png

391 ms

6dcc8c_a2e2b7cd89d54b849c5a511778c9451c~mv2.png

6dcc8c_a2e2b7cd89d54b849c5a511778c9451c~mv2.png

478 ms

6dcc8c_7576d793a28e4ebcb174562a58044479~mv2.png

6dcc8c_7576d793a28e4ebcb174562a58044479~mv2.png

463 ms

thumb%20-%20reva%20-%202x.png

thumb%20-%20reva%20-%202x.png

484 ms

d130ff_4aa4125f58964f329713a5f6021d5de1~mv2.webp

d130ff_4aa4125f58964f329713a5f6021d5de1~mv2.webp

652 ms

d130ff_7314078c84024a1cb5fbe1cef89ede51~mv2.webp

d130ff_7314078c84024a1cb5fbe1cef89ede51~mv2.webp

610 ms

d130ff_60146a18d19b458998e9517996899ad6~mv2.webp

d130ff_60146a18d19b458998e9517996899ad6~mv2.webp

436 ms

d130ff_60146a18d19b458998e9517996899ad6~mv2.webp

d130ff_60146a18d19b458998e9517996899ad6~mv2.webp

440 ms

6dcc8c_9ed4e373e3354f159cbd407b15e0eed4~mv2.png

6dcc8c_9ed4e373e3354f159cbd407b15e0eed4~mv2.png

582 ms

top_clutch_co_software_developers_cluj-napoca_2023.png

top_clutch_co_software_developers_cluj-napoca_2023.png

611 ms

top_clutch_co_elixir_developer_2023.png

top_clutch_co_elixir_developer_2023.png

653 ms

top_clutch_co_it_services_company_cluj-napoca_2023.png

top_clutch_co_it_services_company_cluj-napoca_2023.png

708 ms

file.woff

file.woff

528 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

72 ms

145 ms

141 ms

135 ms

136 ms

138 ms

130 ms

207 ms

196 ms

198 ms

198 ms

201 ms

190 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

8 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

30 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

craftingsoftware.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

craftingsoftware.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

craftingsoftware.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Craftingsoftware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Craftingsoftware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

craftingsoftware.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crafting Software. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: